Skip to main content

David Hicks: Reflections retrospectively

The outcome in the Hicks saga just won't go away with various people reflecting on the matter both in Australia and around the world. The more that emerges about the "trial" and the outcome, the more the questions which are raised.

One of the latest to weigh in on an analysis from a legal perspective is Ben Wizner, attorney for the American Civil Liberty Union. In a piece in the LA Times under the heading "The real crime in the David Hicks case" he says:

"With the guilty plea and sentencing of Australian David Hicks before a military commission at Guantanamo Bay last week, the United States achieved something it had not attempted since Nuremberg: the conviction of a foreign citizen in a military tribunal for violation of the laws of war.

As in Nuremberg, it was not just the detainee on trial but the military commission system itself. The legitimacy of the enterprise hinges on whether the U.S. demonstrates to the world that it can provide impartial justice to those it accuses of war crimes.

I traveled to Guantanamo to observe the Hicks proceedings, and to say that they lacked the dignity and gravitas of Nuremberg is to engage in colossal understatement. The military commissions have been a profoundly unserious legal exercise from the start. The prison at Guantanamo was fashioned as an island outside the reach of U.S. law, and the commissions were devised to provide an illusion of legal process."

Mike Carlton's take on the whole Hicks "thing" in his weekly column in the SMH is put this way:

"How infuriating for the Bush-Howard media toadies that David Hicks turned out to be not much of a terrorist after all. Not a terrorist's bootlace, really.

For five years they dutifully parroted the official line. Hicks was a trained killer, a murderer, the worst of the worst, a threat to us all, an evil menace, Osama bin Laden's golden-haired boy, a traitor.

But when we got to the crunch, all the Pentagon could produce was a confused and deluded knockabout whose most wicked act of terrorism was to guard a Taliban tank at Kandahar airport for a few days. When the whips got cracking, he threw away his AK-47 and did a runner.

The indefatigable Major Michael "Dan" Mori, put it succinctly. His client was a hapless "wannabe soldier", who had harmed no one. "The wannabe finally got a real taste of it and ran away," he said.

In this column last week I predicted that Hicks would be banged up behind bars long enough to keep him out of the way during the coming election campaign. This duly came to pass.

It is possible that the Prime Minister engineered the happy outcome over a Scotch with Deadeye Dick Cheney during his recent visit. It is equally possible that the Americans, ever helpful, did it off their own bat. A Pentagon brigadier-general boasted, rather oddly, that he alone had thought up the idea of gagging Hicks for a year, on pain of a return to Gitmo should that undertaking be broken. This hit the heights of absurdity. Even Philip Ruddock had to concede that it was unenforceable in law and in practice.

A last word might go to that former Liberal prime minister turned subversive left-wing anarchist Malcolm Fraser. The US military commission was a fraudulent tribunal, he wrote for the online lobby group Australians All.

"If our Government is prepared to allow any one of its citizens to be sacrificed on the altar of expediency, if our Government demonstrates that it is not really concerned for justice, for a fair process, for one person, then none of us knows whether circumstances might arise in which the same lack of care, lack of concern, will be exhibited in relation to ourselves."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Donald T: First seduced..... then betrayed!

All those supporters of Trump - who, heaven's only knows, got him headed for the White House - are in a for more than a rude awakening and shock.   Whatever Trump "promised" is just not going to happen....as Paul Krugman so clearly spells out in his latest op-ed piece "Seduced and Betrayed by Donald Trump" in The New York Times.

"Donald Trump won the Electoral College (though not the popular vote) on the strength of overwhelming support from working-class whites, who feel left behind by a changing economy and society. And they’re about to get their reward — the same reward that, throughout Mr. Trump’s career, has come to everyone who trusted his good intentions. Think Trump University.

Yes, the white working class is about to be betrayed.

The evidence of that coming betrayal is obvious in the choice of an array of pro-corporate, anti-labor figures for key positions. In particular, the most important story of the week — seriously, people, stop focusing on Trum…

Snooping..... at its worst

The Brits have just brought in legislation which allows for unprecedented "snooping" in a Western democracy - says Edward Snowden.   Let truthdig explain....

"On Tuesday, the United Kingdom instated the Investigatory Powers Act 2016, a piece of legislation described by whistleblower Edward Snowden as “the most extreme surveillance in the history of western democracy.”

The law, informally known as the “Snooper’s Charter,” spent over a year in Parliament before it was passed. The Guardian reported:

"The new surveillance law requires web and phone companies to store everyone’s web browsing histories for 12 months and give the police, security services and official agencies unprecedented access to the data.

It also provides the security services and police with new powers to hack into computers and phones and to collect communications data in bulk. The law requires judges to sign off police requests to view journalists’ call and web records, but the measure has been descri…

A "Muslim Register"

Outrageous is the word which immediately comes to mind - the idea of a  Muslim Register which Trump has floated.     And how and by or through whom would this Registry comes into being?    Let The Intercept explain.....

"Every American corporation, from the largest conglomerate to the smallest firm, should ask itself right now: Will we do business with the Trump administration to further its most extreme, draconian goals? Or will we resist?

This question is perhaps most important for the country’s tech companies, which are particularly valuable partners for a budding authoritarian. The Intercept contacted nine of the most prominent such firms, from Facebook to Booz Allen Hamilton, to ask if they would sell their services to help create a national Muslim registry, an idea recently resurfaced by Donald Trump’s transition team. Only Twitter said no.

Shortly after the election, IBM CEO Ginni Rometty wrote a personal letter to President-elect Trump in which she offered her congratulation…