Skip to main content

Oz PM in Washington....Cringing Spectacle!

John Howard is in Washington as we all know, all too well, from the media here.

Today the Washington Post even reported on our PM's visit, but pointedly noted:

"Little wonder the president lavished such attention on his counterpart from Down Under. When it comes to Bush's "coalition of the willing" partners, Howard is virtually the last man standing."

Seemingly "blind" to what is going on in being feted as he is [I had understood Howard is a little hard of hearing] we have the spectacle of a PM seemingly fawning at the feet of Washington's B-grade team - George, Dick, Condi and Rumsie. It's all rather too much as Phillip Adams suggests in his column in The Australian yesterday:

"You may recall the outrage when Latham resorted to metaphors involving noses and buttocks. He implied that no cork was ever more tightly fitted in a bottle of champers than John Howard's proboscis in the seat of presidential power. Not merely supportive, Howard's relationship was suppositorial.

But that was back in the heady days of 9/11 when some degree of collective insanity was understandable, even forgivable. That was before George W. Bush had proved himself pig-ignorant of geography, history and intelligent strategy, before he'd embarked on a couple of doomed Vietnam-style adventures. Two wars, one vengeful, one pre-emptive, military cures that would prove worse than the disease, cost the US billions of dollars and thousands of lives, and leave the Bush administration in smouldering ruins. Baghdad on the Potomac.

Where's Latham when you need him? Only he, with his gift for the political vulgarism, could find words to describe the scene this week. There's Howard back in Washington with Bush and his whole discredited team: Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Condoleezza Rice, the gang that can't shoot or think straight. The blundering bullies who, deciding to impose Pax Americana with all their might and missile, squandered the world's goodwill, made enemies out of allies.

Not content with telling the biggest porkies in modern history, this bunch of dills were conned by the neo-cons into a huge political, diplomatic and fiscal catastrophe. Now their collective credibility rates with shares in Enron. Yet instead of taking stock, Howard is buying stock."

Read Adams' full column here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Pentagon's eye-popping spending....and waste!

Only a gigantic bureaucracy could get away with spending of such dimensions - and the amazing waste involved in part of that ginormous spend.   Think US Pentagon..... "From spending $150 million on private villas for a handful of personnel in Afghanistan to blowing $2.7 billion on an air surveillance balloon that doesn’t work, the latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.  Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars' worth of weapons components that will never be used. And then there’s the one that would have to be everyone’s favorite Pentagon waste story: the spending of $50,000 to investigate the bomb-detecting capabilities of African elephants. (And here’s a shock: they didn’t turn out to be that great!) The elephant research, of course, represe...

Video: Israel demolishing a Bedouin village

From Mondoweiss - Israel's supposed "most moral army in the world", the IDF, engaged in immoral, and according to international law, illegal action.... "Israeli forces have demolished every home in the Bedouin village of Khirbet Taha in the northern West Bank district of Nablus during three separate demolitions since the start of the year. Unlike most Bedouin villages, the residents in Khirbet Taha own their own land. However that land falls in Area C, territory in the occupied West Bank under full Israeli control. The village’s only school was also destroyed, leaving children to study in a dilapidated 100-year-old mosque — the only structure left standing in the village. According the United Nations, Israel has demolished half as many Palestinian buildings in the first few months of 2016, as they had in all of 2015. In February alone, the UN found that more Palestinians homes were destroyed than any other month since 2009, when the organization began its docum...

What does a no-fly zone actually mean?

As some countries consider imposing a no-fly zone in relation to Libya, the pertinent question must be what does that mean and entail? FP provides the answers: "It depends on the circumstances. There are two primary types of no-fly zones imposed by air forces. The first is imposed by one military over another, while the two sides are at war. In practice, this type of no-fly zone amounts to a warning from one side that it will engage the other's aircraft if they are spotted in a given territory. The second type, more applicable to the situation in Libya, is when an outside power possessing overwhelming air superiority restricts flights over a given country in order to discourage an internal conflict or humanitarian crisis. This is a relatively recent tactic, which was used most famously in Bosnia and Iraq during the 1990s. No-fly zones are often a compromise in situations where the international community is demanding a response to ongoing violence, but full military interven...