Skip to main content

Criminal Neglect

There would be few around Australia whose heart haven't gone out to the 5 year-old Sophie Delezio so apparently severely injured, again, in Sydney on Friday.

One can only hope and pray that she will pull through this and make a reasonable recovery.

Could the incident have been avoided? A resounding YES if this item in the SMH is correct. People have for years been lobbying for a traffic light to be installed at the crossing. And where have the authorities, yet again, been? Missing in action!

Read this [from the SMH here] and be angry at what can only be described as criminal neglect in failing to instal traffic lights where they were clearly needed.

"Ms Myhre, who has received counselling, has joined in criticism of the crossing, saying she believes its design was a major factor in the crash.

Nearby residents said they had been pursuing authorities to install traffic lights for more than a decade.

Mr Delezio also voiced his support for changes, saying: "Something definitely needs to be done on that pedestrian crossing."

At least two other children have been injured on the site in more than 20 accidents in the past two years.

"From what happened, traffic lights definitely would have made a difference," Ms Myhre said from the Delezio family home.

Andie Lovegrove, who lives next to the crossing said, she had seen 20 minor accidents and three involving ambulances in the past three years.

The mother of two said the crossing was so dangerous locals refused to use it and a six-year-old boy was struck there two years ago. Another neighbour, Bob Spike, said a 10-year-old boy on a bike had been knocked down about six months ago.

Mrs Lovegrove said the sound of screeching brakes was common.

"There are two lanes in the westerly direction," she said. "If you are crossing you need both lanes to stop and there's every chance the second lane won't stop."

Mr Spike said he had successfully lobbied former local MP Peter Macdonald to get zigzag lines installed near the crossing six months ago. But he and Mrs Lovegrove agreed that traffic lights were necessary."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Pentagon's eye-popping spending....and waste!

Only a gigantic bureaucracy could get away with spending of such dimensions - and the amazing waste involved in part of that ginormous spend.   Think US Pentagon..... "From spending $150 million on private villas for a handful of personnel in Afghanistan to blowing $2.7 billion on an air surveillance balloon that doesn’t work, the latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.  Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars' worth of weapons components that will never be used. And then there’s the one that would have to be everyone’s favorite Pentagon waste story: the spending of $50,000 to investigate the bomb-detecting capabilities of African elephants. (And here’s a shock: they didn’t turn out to be that great!) The elephant research, of course, represe...

Video: Israel demolishing a Bedouin village

From Mondoweiss - Israel's supposed "most moral army in the world", the IDF, engaged in immoral, and according to international law, illegal action.... "Israeli forces have demolished every home in the Bedouin village of Khirbet Taha in the northern West Bank district of Nablus during three separate demolitions since the start of the year. Unlike most Bedouin villages, the residents in Khirbet Taha own their own land. However that land falls in Area C, territory in the occupied West Bank under full Israeli control. The village’s only school was also destroyed, leaving children to study in a dilapidated 100-year-old mosque — the only structure left standing in the village. According the United Nations, Israel has demolished half as many Palestinian buildings in the first few months of 2016, as they had in all of 2015. In February alone, the UN found that more Palestinians homes were destroyed than any other month since 2009, when the organization began its docum...

What does a no-fly zone actually mean?

As some countries consider imposing a no-fly zone in relation to Libya, the pertinent question must be what does that mean and entail? FP provides the answers: "It depends on the circumstances. There are two primary types of no-fly zones imposed by air forces. The first is imposed by one military over another, while the two sides are at war. In practice, this type of no-fly zone amounts to a warning from one side that it will engage the other's aircraft if they are spotted in a given territory. The second type, more applicable to the situation in Libya, is when an outside power possessing overwhelming air superiority restricts flights over a given country in order to discourage an internal conflict or humanitarian crisis. This is a relatively recent tactic, which was used most famously in Bosnia and Iraq during the 1990s. No-fly zones are often a compromise in situations where the international community is demanding a response to ongoing violence, but full military interven...