Skip to main content

Israel shoots the messenger......yet again!

If you don't like what they say simply condemn and ignore them.  Israel has perfected the routine.    Needless to say it fails, miserably, in addressing the issue at hand.    This piece "Israel won't co-operate with UN mission on settlements" from The Age newspaper explains.

"Israel has described as ''hypocritical'' a decision by the United Nations Human Rights Council to launch an investigation into the impact of its settlement construction on the human rights of Palestinians. 

About 500,000 Israelis and 2.5 million Palestinians live in the West Bank and East Jerusalem in areas Israel captured in a 1967 war.


Palestinians say the continued expansion of settlements, considered illegal by the International Court of Justice, denies them a viable state, making a ''two-state solution'' all but impossible to achieve. Israel says the status of settlements should be decided in peace negotiations.

The 47-member council decided late on Thursday to: ''dispatch an independent international fact-finding mission … to investigate the implications of the Israeli settlements on the civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights of the Palestinian people throughout the Occupied Palestinian Territory.''


It called on Israel to co-operate fully with the mission and not obstruct the process - a request Israel has already said it will deny. A government official quoted in The Jerusalem Post said Israel ''would not co-operate with a kangaroo court''.


Israel's Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, described the UN body as ''detached from reality'', saying it was a ''hypocritical council with an automatic majority against Israel''.
But a Palestine Liberation Organisation executive committee member, Hanan Ashrawi, welcomed the move, saying: ''Israel cannot continue to violate flagrantly and wilfully its obligations under international and humanitarian law without consequence.''


In most areas in which settlements are constructed, Palestinians are prohibited from building new homes or structures or renovating existing buildings, and many are prevented from using roads and accessing electricity, water and other utilities. They are subjected to hundreds of checkpoints, forcing them to abandon the most direct route to their homes and travel long distances.


The planning restrictions forced Palestinians to build without building permits and live under the constant threat of eviction and demolition, the Office for the Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs said in its February report.


In the first two months of 2012, the Israeli authorities demolished 120 Palestinian-owned structures, including 36 homes. This displaced 229 people - about 60 per cent of these were children - and adversely affected 450 others, it found.


Meanwhile, violence perpetrated by Israeli settlers continued to be reported throughout the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, OCHA said. ''Attacks by settlers against Palestinians and their property take various forms, including attacks with live ammunition and baseball bats, the cutting of trees, stone throwing and the vandalising and torching of mosques, in addition to other various types of assault.''


Last year, almost 10,000 trees, mainly olive trees, were damaged or uprooted by Israeli settlers, severely affecting the livelihood of hundreds of Palestinian families, OCHA found.
In two reports to Brussels from EU heads of mission, officials found settler violence against Palestinians had more than tripled in three years to total hundreds of incidents, The Guardian reported.


The starting date for the international UN fact-finding mission is yet to be confirmed."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reading the Chilcot Inquiry Report more closely

Most commentary on the Chilcot Inquiry Report of and associated with the Iraq War, has been "lifted" from the Executive Summary.   The Intercept has actually gone and dug into the Report, with these revelations : "THE CHILCOT REPORT, the U.K.’s official inquiry into its participation in the Iraq War, has finally been released after seven years of investigation. Its executive summary certainly makes former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who led the British push for war, look terrible. According to the report, Blair made statements about Iraq’s nonexistent chemical, biological, and nuclear programs based on “what Mr. Blair believed” rather than the intelligence he had been given. The U.K. went to war despite the fact that “diplomatic options had not been exhausted.” Blair was warned by British intelligence that terrorism would “increase in the event of war, reflecting intensified anti-US/anti-Western sentiment in the Muslim world, including among Muslim communities in the

Robert Fisk's predictions for the Middle East in 2013

There is no gain-saying that Robert Fisk, fiercely independent and feisty to boot, is the veteran journalist and author covering the Middle East. Who doesn't he know or hasn't he met over the years in reporting from Beirut - where he lives?  In his latest op-ed piece for The Independent he lays out his predictions for the Middle East for 2013. Read the piece in full, here - well worthwhile - but an extract... "Never make predictions in the Middle East. My crystal ball broke long ago. But predicting the region has an honourable pedigree. “An Arab movement, newly-risen, is looming in the distance,” a French traveller to the Gulf and Baghdad wrote in 1883, “and a race hitherto downtrodden will presently claim its due place in the destinies of Islam.” A year earlier, a British diplomat in Jeddah confided that “it is within my knowledge... that the idea of freedom does at present agitate some minds even in Mecca...” So let’s say this for 2013: the “Arab Awakening” (the t

An unpalatable truth!

Quinoa has for the last years been the "new" food on the block for foodies. Known for its health properties, foodies the world over have taken to it. Many restaurants have added it to their menu. But, as this piece " Can vegans stomach the unpalatable truth about quinoa? " from The Guardian so clearly details, the cost to Bolivians and Peruvians - from where quinoa hails - has been substantial. "Not long ago, quinoa was just an obscure Peruvian grain you could only buy in wholefood shops. We struggled to pronounce it (it's keen-wa, not qui-no-a), yet it was feted by food lovers as a novel addition to the familiar ranks of couscous and rice. Dieticians clucked over quinoa approvingly because it ticked the low-fat box and fitted in with government healthy eating advice to "base your meals on starchy foods". Adventurous eaters liked its slightly bitter taste and the little white curls that formed around the grains. Vegans embraced quinoa as