Skip to main content

Women in Afghanistan

It is often said by the invading forces in Afghanistan that one objective in going into the country was to help the plight of women under the rule of the Taliban.    The results are mixed as the special report on GlobalPost highlights.

"In the decade since the United States invaded Afghanistan and toppled the Taliban government in Kabul, many positive changes have taken place in Afghanistan, particularly for women. There are many oft-cited statistics to illustrate this, including: the 2.7 million girls now in school, the 68 women currently in parliament, a female provincial governor, a female cabinet minister, and advocacy groups all over the country working to better the lives of Afghan women.

But GlobalPost has spent several months unearthing other facts and previously untold stories of women and girls caught in the labyrinth of Afghan’s corrupt and failing judicial system. These facts and the stories behind them do not bode so well for the future of Afghanistan’s women:

*Violence against women has never been higher, according to the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission (AIHRC). The statistics for 2011 show a sharp increase over the same period in 2010.

*Nearly 90 percent of all cases, both criminal and civil, are settled in informal (tribal) courts, where women’s rights are almost universally ignored.

*Tribal courts still widely engage in practices inimical to women, such as “ba’ad” — the tradition of bartering a girl or woman as settlement for a dispute between families.

*Tribal courts now enjoy US funding and protection; the US government is putting roughly $15 million into the so-called ‘informal justice’ sector this year.

*Critics of the program worry that by providing aid and support for these tribal courts, the US government is giving legitimacy and power to a structure that will never defend the rights of women.

As women’s rights activist Roshan Sirran stated in an interview with GlobalPost: “In the tribal courts, the first sacrifice is women. Always.”

In this ‘Special Report’ titled “Life Sentence: Women and Justice in Afghanistan,” GlobalPost correspondent Jean MacKenzie examines several heart-wrenching stories that have not made it into the media spotlight. These are tales of women who have been unfairly imprisoned, traded off like sheep to settle murder cases, mistreated by family members and isolated from society by traditions that they are powerless to change.

In every case, the tribal courts, often aided by the state system, were the perpetrators of injustice.

For too many Afghan women, it seems just being born in the country amounts to a life sentence."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Pentagon's eye-popping spending....and waste!

Only a gigantic bureaucracy could get away with spending of such dimensions - and the amazing waste involved in part of that ginormous spend.   Think US Pentagon..... "From spending $150 million on private villas for a handful of personnel in Afghanistan to blowing $2.7 billion on an air surveillance balloon that doesn’t work, the latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.  Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars' worth of weapons components that will never be used. And then there’s the one that would have to be everyone’s favorite Pentagon waste story: the spending of $50,000 to investigate the bomb-detecting capabilities of African elephants. (And here’s a shock: they didn’t turn out to be that great!) The elephant research, of course, represe...

Video: Israel demolishing a Bedouin village

From Mondoweiss - Israel's supposed "most moral army in the world", the IDF, engaged in immoral, and according to international law, illegal action.... "Israeli forces have demolished every home in the Bedouin village of Khirbet Taha in the northern West Bank district of Nablus during three separate demolitions since the start of the year. Unlike most Bedouin villages, the residents in Khirbet Taha own their own land. However that land falls in Area C, territory in the occupied West Bank under full Israeli control. The village’s only school was also destroyed, leaving children to study in a dilapidated 100-year-old mosque — the only structure left standing in the village. According the United Nations, Israel has demolished half as many Palestinian buildings in the first few months of 2016, as they had in all of 2015. In February alone, the UN found that more Palestinians homes were destroyed than any other month since 2009, when the organization began its docum...

What does a no-fly zone actually mean?

As some countries consider imposing a no-fly zone in relation to Libya, the pertinent question must be what does that mean and entail? FP provides the answers: "It depends on the circumstances. There are two primary types of no-fly zones imposed by air forces. The first is imposed by one military over another, while the two sides are at war. In practice, this type of no-fly zone amounts to a warning from one side that it will engage the other's aircraft if they are spotted in a given territory. The second type, more applicable to the situation in Libya, is when an outside power possessing overwhelming air superiority restricts flights over a given country in order to discourage an internal conflict or humanitarian crisis. This is a relatively recent tactic, which was used most famously in Bosnia and Iraq during the 1990s. No-fly zones are often a compromise in situations where the international community is demanding a response to ongoing violence, but full military interven...