Skip to main content

Bali: Village of the Deaf

A wonderful piece from The Global Mail - from a corner of the world we don't read about all that much - which is both heart-warming and inspirational.

"In the rest of the Bali – indeed in much of the developing world, and especially in its remote villages – being born deaf can be more profoundly isolating than others can easily imagine. With no language and little chance of education, the world is not simply silent, it is utterly bewildering. Frequently, deafness carries not just neglect but also a cruel stigma and separation from everyone around you.

On the northern slopes of Bali, about four hours from the tourist-heavy south, Bengkala is a fascinating example of a

community that has spontaneously adapted to ease the burden of deafness.

The village has its reasons for this.

According to local history, congenital deafness began showing up among village children eight generations ago, says Kanta, 55, a villager who has taken it upon himself to lead the education of local deaf children. Five generations ago, the number of deaf exploded, a situation that has continued, likely because of close intermarriage in the village.

Today, 44 villagers are kolok, or deaf (33 of them are currently living within the confines of the village). With a high rate of deafness, the indigenous sign language has evolved and spread, aided by the uniquely close-knit nature of Balinese life, where extended families live in walled compounds and are intimately tied to clans and, above that, powerful hamlet councils known as banjar. Because each of the village’s 12 clans contains kolok, Kanta explains, most villagers know how to speak with them. In daily life, the deaf are at little disadvantage.

“If the deaf and the hearing are interacting well with each other then it automatically becomes part of the culture,” Kanta says."

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Pentagon's eye-popping spending....and waste!

Only a gigantic bureaucracy could get away with spending of such dimensions - and the amazing waste involved in part of that ginormous spend.   Think US Pentagon..... "From spending $150 million on private villas for a handful of personnel in Afghanistan to blowing $2.7 billion on an air surveillance balloon that doesn’t work, the latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.  Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars' worth of weapons components that will never be used. And then there’s the one that would have to be everyone’s favorite Pentagon waste story: the spending of $50,000 to investigate the bomb-detecting capabilities of African elephants. (And here’s a shock: they didn’t turn out to be that great!) The elephant research, of course, represe...
Post a Comment
Read more

Video: Israel demolishing a Bedouin village

From Mondoweiss - Israel's supposed "most moral army in the world", the IDF, engaged in immoral, and according to international law, illegal action.... "Israeli forces have demolished every home in the Bedouin village of Khirbet Taha in the northern West Bank district of Nablus during three separate demolitions since the start of the year. Unlike most Bedouin villages, the residents in Khirbet Taha own their own land. However that land falls in Area C, territory in the occupied West Bank under full Israeli control. The village’s only school was also destroyed, leaving children to study in a dilapidated 100-year-old mosque — the only structure left standing in the village. According the United Nations, Israel has demolished half as many Palestinian buildings in the first few months of 2016, as they had in all of 2015. In February alone, the UN found that more Palestinians homes were destroyed than any other month since 2009, when the organization began its docum...
Post a Comment
Read more

What does a no-fly zone actually mean?

As some countries consider imposing a no-fly zone in relation to Libya, the pertinent question must be what does that mean and entail? FP provides the answers: "It depends on the circumstances. There are two primary types of no-fly zones imposed by air forces. The first is imposed by one military over another, while the two sides are at war. In practice, this type of no-fly zone amounts to a warning from one side that it will engage the other's aircraft if they are spotted in a given territory. The second type, more applicable to the situation in Libya, is when an outside power possessing overwhelming air superiority restricts flights over a given country in order to discourage an internal conflict or humanitarian crisis. This is a relatively recent tactic, which was used most famously in Bosnia and Iraq during the 1990s. No-fly zones are often a compromise in situations where the international community is demanding a response to ongoing violence, but full military interven...
6 comments
Read more