Skip to main content

Perhaps it's bye, bye

It's attracted little media coverage - although a possible attack on the country has - but the Iranians have just held an election.   The outcome is an interesting one for it saw Ahmadinejad lose heavily - so much so, that there are clear noises coming from the powers that be that the office of president may well be abolished or reduced in its power and influence.

"Iran is a complicated country. It has an unelected dictator -- Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei -- as well as an elected parliament. It has opposition parties. There are checks and balances, although understanding them requires a very complicated org chart. Iranian politics are also in constant flux. Unlike the established democracies of the West or the streamlined dictatorships of the Middle East, Iran's complex political system has been evolving (and sometimes devolving) since its 1979 inception as a half-thought-out combination of democracy and theocracy, two ideas that turned out to be a lot more difficult to negotiate than Iran's revolutionaries anticipated.

The Iranian system now seems to be changing again. A national election this weekend, the first since 2009's protest-ridden vote, saw loyalists of Supreme Leader Khamenei sweep the parliament, while allies of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad fared very poorly. Though outsiders often perceive the Iranian government as monolithic, it is not, and Khamenei and Ahmadinejad have been locked in a power struggle since April 2011. This vote, which appears to have been largely fraudulent, signals that the Iranian political infrastructure has probably now aligned itself against Ahmadinejad and behind Khamenei.

Part of the conflict is personal -- Ahmadinejad would like more power for himself -- but it's also about ideological differences. Ahmadinejad has attempted to make Iran's government more secular, which Khamenei naturally opposes. He's also pushed internally for more cooperation with the West, including over Iran's nuclear program. Khamenei supporters see this effort as a failure of Ahmadinejad's worldview, an embarrassment for Iran, and a lesson to not trust the Americans.

As increasingly crippling sanctions and the threat of an Israeli or U.S. military strike lead the Iranian regime to dig in, Tehran's leaders appear more paranoid, more entrenched, and less willing to tolerate dissent than ever. This means locking up dissidents, bloggers, and activists, but it also means winding down Iran's more democratic elements and unifying the government into something that more closely resembles a dictatorship. And it's not just Ahmadinejad who's being shut out (few analysts believe he will survive in the government beyond 2013, when his current term ends, if he even makes it that long). The entire office of the Iranian presidency could be scrapped."

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Pentagon's eye-popping spending....and waste!

Only a gigantic bureaucracy could get away with spending of such dimensions - and the amazing waste involved in part of that ginormous spend.   Think US Pentagon..... "From spending $150 million on private villas for a handful of personnel in Afghanistan to blowing $2.7 billion on an air surveillance balloon that doesn’t work, the latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.  Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars' worth of weapons components that will never be used. And then there’s the one that would have to be everyone’s favorite Pentagon waste story: the spending of $50,000 to investigate the bomb-detecting capabilities of African elephants. (And here’s a shock: they didn’t turn out to be that great!) The elephant research, of course, represe...
Post a Comment
Read more

Video: Israel demolishing a Bedouin village

From Mondoweiss - Israel's supposed "most moral army in the world", the IDF, engaged in immoral, and according to international law, illegal action.... "Israeli forces have demolished every home in the Bedouin village of Khirbet Taha in the northern West Bank district of Nablus during three separate demolitions since the start of the year. Unlike most Bedouin villages, the residents in Khirbet Taha own their own land. However that land falls in Area C, territory in the occupied West Bank under full Israeli control. The village’s only school was also destroyed, leaving children to study in a dilapidated 100-year-old mosque — the only structure left standing in the village. According the United Nations, Israel has demolished half as many Palestinian buildings in the first few months of 2016, as they had in all of 2015. In February alone, the UN found that more Palestinians homes were destroyed than any other month since 2009, when the organization began its docum...
Post a Comment
Read more

What does a no-fly zone actually mean?

As some countries consider imposing a no-fly zone in relation to Libya, the pertinent question must be what does that mean and entail? FP provides the answers: "It depends on the circumstances. There are two primary types of no-fly zones imposed by air forces. The first is imposed by one military over another, while the two sides are at war. In practice, this type of no-fly zone amounts to a warning from one side that it will engage the other's aircraft if they are spotted in a given territory. The second type, more applicable to the situation in Libya, is when an outside power possessing overwhelming air superiority restricts flights over a given country in order to discourage an internal conflict or humanitarian crisis. This is a relatively recent tactic, which was used most famously in Bosnia and Iraq during the 1990s. No-fly zones are often a compromise in situations where the international community is demanding a response to ongoing violence, but full military interven...
6 comments
Read more