Skip to main content

How women rate & rank in the world

In a piece commemorating International Women's Day, an op-ed piece in Toronto's the star.com puts into context how women rank in the world.   It's not such a happy or positive picture....

"On the 101st International Women’s Day, let’s skip across borders. Where are the best, safest places on the planet to be female? Where are the most frightening, miserable and hopeless?

If you judge by what Afghan President Hamid Karzai said Tuesday, Afghanistan is proudly near the top in wretchedness. “Men are fundamental and women are secondary,” the Ulema Council of 150 top Muslim clerics officially declared in its code of conduct and Karzai posted it on his website. I’m surprised he didn’t Tweet it. I’m surprised it’s news.

Nevertheless, Afghanistan is not the worst place to be a woman, according to political, educational, jobs and health indicators, the Independent concluded recently in a statistical study. Yemen is. Afghanistan is merely the most dangerous. One wonders why we went to war there. Did we really improve women’s lives? Was this ever our aim?

Going solely by political representation, Rwanda does best with 56.3 per cent of its 80-seat lower house being female. But it’s not a balanced contest worldwide, with http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2012/mar/07/women-representation-in-politics-worldwide?INTCMP=SRCHDatablog research from the Interparliamentary Union and UN Women revealing that seven countries have no female representation whatsoever, including Saudi Arabia and Qatar, nations we like to consider allies.

Egypt has all of two women representatives, which suggests the so-called Arab Spring is still wintry for women.

Canada does badly, 40th in the world for women political representatives — one place below little Luxembourg — with 76 of 308 Canadian House of Commons seats going to women. But it’s better than Britain at #54, tied with Malawi. And it is much better than the U.S. which stands at #78, tied with Turkmenistan, and far below many nations it professes to despise.

“Less than one in five parliamentarians in the world today are women,” concludes IPU head Anders P. Johnsson. “It is a worrying statistic at this point of human development and impossible to justify. The political will to change this is simply lacking in most cases.” This is a fact. It hurts.

Norway is the best place to become a mother, with maternal mortality at one in 7,600. Afghanistan is the worst, with the Independent reporting that a woman is at least 200 times more likely to die during childbirth than from warfare.

Sweden comes first in abortion rights, with abortions available without restriction for the first 18 weeks. El Salvador, the Philippines and Nicaragua all ban abortion, as would the U.S. if a Republican defeated President Barack Obama, and one hopes he won’t. Canada doesn’t do too badly, unless you live in P.E.I. where no abortions are permitted, or New Brunswick, a province that ignores the national Health Care Act and where poor women cannot get an abortion.

Women live longest in Japan, perhaps because life is comparatively restful without hope of great success. Only 8 per cent of upper management is female. Danish women only spend 57 more minutes a day on unpaid work than Danish men, but Mexican women spend a full four hours and 21 minutes more.

Qatar is a great place for women to attend university. They outnumber men six to one, perhaps to fill the empty hours, because there are few jobs for them when they leave. Saudi Arabia is the only nation to ban women from driving, not that they could afford a car. Saudi women earn an average $7,157 U.S. a year, compared with men’s $36,727.

It’s hard to draw specific lessons from these numbers but easy to draw wide conclusions. In most of the world, you drew the short straw when you were born female and the unfortunate consequences will range from being forced to live a tiny cramped life to suffering early death.

In Canada, I try to take heart from the fact that we live amid a work in progress. Women only became legal “persons” in 1929, Dr. Henry Morgentaler only won us abortion rights in 1988 and we are still swimming on the surface of a massive sea change in human relations. Women have never had many rights. Now we have some.

But I do not say that it can only get better. In Canada and the U.S., women’s rights are under attack every day. It can get much much worse.

That said, I wave a distant greeting to the “secondary” women of Afghanistan, where the council also declares wife-beating just fine as long as a man has a good sharia reason. Much disgust comes your way, councillors!

On March 8, 2013, we’ll check the numbers again, and rate the worldwide welfare of women’s bodies and souls."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Pentagon's eye-popping spending....and waste!

Only a gigantic bureaucracy could get away with spending of such dimensions - and the amazing waste involved in part of that ginormous spend.   Think US Pentagon..... "From spending $150 million on private villas for a handful of personnel in Afghanistan to blowing $2.7 billion on an air surveillance balloon that doesn’t work, the latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.  Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars' worth of weapons components that will never be used. And then there’s the one that would have to be everyone’s favorite Pentagon waste story: the spending of $50,000 to investigate the bomb-detecting capabilities of African elephants. (And here’s a shock: they didn’t turn out to be that great!) The elephant research, of course, represe...

Video: Israel demolishing a Bedouin village

From Mondoweiss - Israel's supposed "most moral army in the world", the IDF, engaged in immoral, and according to international law, illegal action.... "Israeli forces have demolished every home in the Bedouin village of Khirbet Taha in the northern West Bank district of Nablus during three separate demolitions since the start of the year. Unlike most Bedouin villages, the residents in Khirbet Taha own their own land. However that land falls in Area C, territory in the occupied West Bank under full Israeli control. The village’s only school was also destroyed, leaving children to study in a dilapidated 100-year-old mosque — the only structure left standing in the village. According the United Nations, Israel has demolished half as many Palestinian buildings in the first few months of 2016, as they had in all of 2015. In February alone, the UN found that more Palestinians homes were destroyed than any other month since 2009, when the organization began its docum...

What does a no-fly zone actually mean?

As some countries consider imposing a no-fly zone in relation to Libya, the pertinent question must be what does that mean and entail? FP provides the answers: "It depends on the circumstances. There are two primary types of no-fly zones imposed by air forces. The first is imposed by one military over another, while the two sides are at war. In practice, this type of no-fly zone amounts to a warning from one side that it will engage the other's aircraft if they are spotted in a given territory. The second type, more applicable to the situation in Libya, is when an outside power possessing overwhelming air superiority restricts flights over a given country in order to discourage an internal conflict or humanitarian crisis. This is a relatively recent tactic, which was used most famously in Bosnia and Iraq during the 1990s. No-fly zones are often a compromise in situations where the international community is demanding a response to ongoing violence, but full military interven...