Skip to main content

And you call that airport security?

The US TSA has previously been called to account for the way it operates the so-called security system at US airports.

Once again, it is challenged in the way it conducts its operations at aiports.

"Recent lapses in security by the TSA, including a Nigerian-American man who has apparently flown repeatedly with false boarding passes, have made it a rough week for the agency charged with protecting the public from terrorists and others.

Other recent mishaps include:

The company that makes airport scanners say they’re safer than eating a banana. But some scientists with an expertise in imaging and cancer now say that the evidence made public to support these claims is unreliable and suggest that may be why the TSA won’t make the machines available for independent testing.

ProRepublica also reports that security officials have briefed domestic and foreign airline officials about the possibility of terrorist groups finding ways to implant explosive devices in humans to blow up passenger jets. That was prompted by the implementatin of the controversial body scanners that can see under clothing.

The Nigerian-American man who called himself a “frequent traveler” was overlooked by the TSA (Transportation Security Administration).

He was only caught because he smelled bad but his case of almost comically evading airport security has a serious side that officials are still struggling to sort out.

But it’s gotten worse for the TSA, which is still reeling over its decision to force a 95-year-old woman in a wheelchair to take off her adult diaper when she went through security in Florida.

The arrested stowaway, Olajide Oluwaseun, has apparently been repeatedly flying around the country on false boarding passes. He is now in custody and charged with being a stowaway, a felony that could land him five years in jail."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reading the Chilcot Inquiry Report more closely

Most commentary on the Chilcot Inquiry Report of and associated with the Iraq War, has been "lifted" from the Executive Summary.   The Intercept has actually gone and dug into the Report, with these revelations : "THE CHILCOT REPORT, the U.K.’s official inquiry into its participation in the Iraq War, has finally been released after seven years of investigation. Its executive summary certainly makes former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who led the British push for war, look terrible. According to the report, Blair made statements about Iraq’s nonexistent chemical, biological, and nuclear programs based on “what Mr. Blair believed” rather than the intelligence he had been given. The U.K. went to war despite the fact that “diplomatic options had not been exhausted.” Blair was warned by British intelligence that terrorism would “increase in the event of war, reflecting intensified anti-US/anti-Western sentiment in the Muslim world, including among Muslim communities in the

Robert Fisk's predictions for the Middle East in 2013

There is no gain-saying that Robert Fisk, fiercely independent and feisty to boot, is the veteran journalist and author covering the Middle East. Who doesn't he know or hasn't he met over the years in reporting from Beirut - where he lives?  In his latest op-ed piece for The Independent he lays out his predictions for the Middle East for 2013. Read the piece in full, here - well worthwhile - but an extract... "Never make predictions in the Middle East. My crystal ball broke long ago. But predicting the region has an honourable pedigree. “An Arab movement, newly-risen, is looming in the distance,” a French traveller to the Gulf and Baghdad wrote in 1883, “and a race hitherto downtrodden will presently claim its due place in the destinies of Islam.” A year earlier, a British diplomat in Jeddah confided that “it is within my knowledge... that the idea of freedom does at present agitate some minds even in Mecca...” So let’s say this for 2013: the “Arab Awakening” (the t

An unpalatable truth!

Quinoa has for the last years been the "new" food on the block for foodies. Known for its health properties, foodies the world over have taken to it. Many restaurants have added it to their menu. But, as this piece " Can vegans stomach the unpalatable truth about quinoa? " from The Guardian so clearly details, the cost to Bolivians and Peruvians - from where quinoa hails - has been substantial. "Not long ago, quinoa was just an obscure Peruvian grain you could only buy in wholefood shops. We struggled to pronounce it (it's keen-wa, not qui-no-a), yet it was feted by food lovers as a novel addition to the familiar ranks of couscous and rice. Dieticians clucked over quinoa approvingly because it ticked the low-fat box and fitted in with government healthy eating advice to "base your meals on starchy foods". Adventurous eaters liked its slightly bitter taste and the little white curls that formed around the grains. Vegans embraced quinoa as