Matt Price, writing in The Australian on John Howard's position on the Vietnam War articulated whilst he was in Vietnam the other day :
"While the teeth-curling Karl Rove moment earned Kim Beazley much opprobrium and ridicule, John Howard's Ho Chi Minh City hokum - just as silly and a lot more dangerous - threatens to escape under the radar.
Asked, not unreasonably, to reflect on the Vietnam War during his visit to the country, the Prime Minister displayed the sort of knee-jerk defensiveness not often seen since Geoffrey Boycott's retirement from international cricket.
"I supported our involvement at the time and I don't intend to recant," was how the PM opened. "In public life you are accountable for the decisions that you take."
Had Howard stopped there he might have sounded half sensible - declaring his stance and resisting the temptation to rewrite history.
But the PM rattled on: "I mean, I didn't hold any position of authority then but I supported the reasons for Australia's involvement and nothing has altered my view that at the time on the assessments that were made then I took that view and I took that view properly and I don't intend to indulge this preoccupation that many have in recanting everything that they supported when they were in positions of authority."
Meanwhile, Gerard Henderson - the scribbler in Sydney who sprouts forth on everything without the breadth of intelligence to bring anything worthwhile to the discussion - on ABC Radio National's Breakfast program this morning accused US Defence Secretary McNamara and former PM Malcolm Fraser as being "self -indulgent" in apologising for the mistakes of going into the Vietnam War. According to Henderson, they can be apologetic in private but not publicly. What drivel! - and what does it say about Henderson's integrity and moral position on anything?
"While the teeth-curling Karl Rove moment earned Kim Beazley much opprobrium and ridicule, John Howard's Ho Chi Minh City hokum - just as silly and a lot more dangerous - threatens to escape under the radar.
Asked, not unreasonably, to reflect on the Vietnam War during his visit to the country, the Prime Minister displayed the sort of knee-jerk defensiveness not often seen since Geoffrey Boycott's retirement from international cricket.
"I supported our involvement at the time and I don't intend to recant," was how the PM opened. "In public life you are accountable for the decisions that you take."
Had Howard stopped there he might have sounded half sensible - declaring his stance and resisting the temptation to rewrite history.
But the PM rattled on: "I mean, I didn't hold any position of authority then but I supported the reasons for Australia's involvement and nothing has altered my view that at the time on the assessments that were made then I took that view and I took that view properly and I don't intend to indulge this preoccupation that many have in recanting everything that they supported when they were in positions of authority."
Meanwhile, Gerard Henderson - the scribbler in Sydney who sprouts forth on everything without the breadth of intelligence to bring anything worthwhile to the discussion - on ABC Radio National's Breakfast program this morning accused US Defence Secretary McNamara and former PM Malcolm Fraser as being "self -indulgent" in apologising for the mistakes of going into the Vietnam War. According to Henderson, they can be apologetic in private but not publicly. What drivel! - and what does it say about Henderson's integrity and moral position on anything?
Comments