Skip to main content

Gaza: Too-high-a-cost to bear

A tragedy whichever you see it.


"The smell of smoke hangs in the air and the scorched walls and blackened floor speak to the depth of the tragedy that occurred here.

Three children - Nadine, 7, Farah, 6, and 3½-year-old Sabre - died in this room when a candle they were using for light started a fire that burnt so fiercely that by the time their mother - asleep in a nearby room - was able to raise the alarm, it was too late."


***

"The Bashir family know that their children fell victim to Gaza's long-running power crisis.
The children's uncle says all parties in this grinding war of attrition, from the Ramallah-based Palestinian Authority to its rivals Hamas, who have ruled Gaza since June 2007, to Israel and its military occupation and siege, bear some responsibility for the family's loss.


The coastal strip's 1.5 million residents have been without power for 18 hours a day over the past two months and suffered electricity shortages for years before that. Candles or generators are the only escape from darkness.


When Egypt started to crack down on fuel smuggling through Gaza's tunnel system near the Rafah border, the strip's sole power station ground to a halt on March 23.


Hamas accused Egypt, Israel and the Palestinian Authority of causing the emergency by insisting that fuel come into Gaza via Israel's Kerem Shalom crossing, allowing the PA to collect taxes on the import and Israel to maintain restrictions on goods coming into Gaza.


In turn, officials from PA President Mahmoud Abbas' Fatah movement accused Hamas of making millions from smuggled fuel. Hamas started smuggling fuel in 2007 after Israel imposed a blockade on Gaza, leading to shortages of fuel for industrial and domestic uses, as well as most other goods. Israel eased the blockade in mid-2010 but fuel is still in short supply."



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Pentagon's eye-popping spending....and waste!

Only a gigantic bureaucracy could get away with spending of such dimensions - and the amazing waste involved in part of that ginormous spend.   Think US Pentagon..... "From spending $150 million on private villas for a handful of personnel in Afghanistan to blowing $2.7 billion on an air surveillance balloon that doesn’t work, the latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.  Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars' worth of weapons components that will never be used. And then there’s the one that would have to be everyone’s favorite Pentagon waste story: the spending of $50,000 to investigate the bomb-detecting capabilities of African elephants. (And here’s a shock: they didn’t turn out to be that great!) The elephant research, of course, represe...

Video: Israel demolishing a Bedouin village

From Mondoweiss - Israel's supposed "most moral army in the world", the IDF, engaged in immoral, and according to international law, illegal action.... "Israeli forces have demolished every home in the Bedouin village of Khirbet Taha in the northern West Bank district of Nablus during three separate demolitions since the start of the year. Unlike most Bedouin villages, the residents in Khirbet Taha own their own land. However that land falls in Area C, territory in the occupied West Bank under full Israeli control. The village’s only school was also destroyed, leaving children to study in a dilapidated 100-year-old mosque — the only structure left standing in the village. According the United Nations, Israel has demolished half as many Palestinian buildings in the first few months of 2016, as they had in all of 2015. In February alone, the UN found that more Palestinians homes were destroyed than any other month since 2009, when the organization began its docum...

What does a no-fly zone actually mean?

As some countries consider imposing a no-fly zone in relation to Libya, the pertinent question must be what does that mean and entail? FP provides the answers: "It depends on the circumstances. There are two primary types of no-fly zones imposed by air forces. The first is imposed by one military over another, while the two sides are at war. In practice, this type of no-fly zone amounts to a warning from one side that it will engage the other's aircraft if they are spotted in a given territory. The second type, more applicable to the situation in Libya, is when an outside power possessing overwhelming air superiority restricts flights over a given country in order to discourage an internal conflict or humanitarian crisis. This is a relatively recent tactic, which was used most famously in Bosnia and Iraq during the 1990s. No-fly zones are often a compromise in situations where the international community is demanding a response to ongoing violence, but full military interven...