Skip to main content

The French presidential election......ho-hum and boring!

Like the French or not, they are going to the first of two polls on 22 April to elect a president.   In what is generally being described as a lack-lustre campaign presently underway, DNA )(Daily News & Analysis) has considers who the candidates are for possible high-office.   

"......since the beginning of the Fifth Republic in 1958, France has never witnessed such boring elections. The new Constitution of the Fifth Republic which replaced the old parliamentary system, undoubtedly brought a stability to the institutions; a majority of the electors are, however, aware that the future President will not be able to solve all the tough problems the country faces.

Sarkozy, once the hyper-president, has lost his halo. He even had to apologise for his ‘people’ (Page Three) period during the first years of his presidency and fewer electors believe that he can deliver new miracles.

Hollande has never been an exciting postulant; further he does not have the charm of his ex-companion Ségolène Royal, Sarkozy’s rival in 2007; the Socialist candidate remains ahead in all surveys and will in all probability be the next president. He has the advantage of incumbency. But this does not make the campaign thrilling.

Bayrou, the eternal looser is unable to bring enthusiasm to a campaign that is turning duller by the day; Bayrou, who wants to be the ‘alternative’ has been downgraded to the fifth place in the surveys.

Marine Le Pen, the daughter of the veteran extreme-right provocateur, Jean-Marie Le Pen is not doing as well as she expected. A few months ago, she thought that she could topple Sarkozy and reach the second round. She is now in the fourth place behind Mélenchon, the only candidate who keeps making inroads, probably thanks to his wild populist promises. But one can’t expect a modern country to return to a Bolshevik system à-la-Chinese.

The less one speaks of the other candidates, the better.
Will the last days of the race, become more ‘sexy’ or at least slightly less boring? No, no, no would say Charlotte.

The real issue is that nobody has the solutions to sort out the economic and social problems facing the country. There is no readymade panacea.

More than 75 % of the French today believe that the globalisation is something negative and that the concurrence of countries like India or China will affect further employment.

Very few believe that a solution will come from the European Union, which is ‘too bureaucratic’ and excessively centralised in its decision process.

The British press never misses an occasion to make fun of the French. The Economist calls France ‘A Country in Denial’. The cover story points out: “What is most striking about the French election is how little anybody is saying about the country’s dire economic straits. The candidates dish out at least as many promises to spend more as to spend less."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Pentagon's eye-popping spending....and waste!

Only a gigantic bureaucracy could get away with spending of such dimensions - and the amazing waste involved in part of that ginormous spend.   Think US Pentagon..... "From spending $150 million on private villas for a handful of personnel in Afghanistan to blowing $2.7 billion on an air surveillance balloon that doesn’t work, the latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.  Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars' worth of weapons components that will never be used. And then there’s the one that would have to be everyone’s favorite Pentagon waste story: the spending of $50,000 to investigate the bomb-detecting capabilities of African elephants. (And here’s a shock: they didn’t turn out to be that great!) The elephant research, of course, represe...

Video: Israel demolishing a Bedouin village

From Mondoweiss - Israel's supposed "most moral army in the world", the IDF, engaged in immoral, and according to international law, illegal action.... "Israeli forces have demolished every home in the Bedouin village of Khirbet Taha in the northern West Bank district of Nablus during three separate demolitions since the start of the year. Unlike most Bedouin villages, the residents in Khirbet Taha own their own land. However that land falls in Area C, territory in the occupied West Bank under full Israeli control. The village’s only school was also destroyed, leaving children to study in a dilapidated 100-year-old mosque — the only structure left standing in the village. According the United Nations, Israel has demolished half as many Palestinian buildings in the first few months of 2016, as they had in all of 2015. In February alone, the UN found that more Palestinians homes were destroyed than any other month since 2009, when the organization began its docum...

What does a no-fly zone actually mean?

As some countries consider imposing a no-fly zone in relation to Libya, the pertinent question must be what does that mean and entail? FP provides the answers: "It depends on the circumstances. There are two primary types of no-fly zones imposed by air forces. The first is imposed by one military over another, while the two sides are at war. In practice, this type of no-fly zone amounts to a warning from one side that it will engage the other's aircraft if they are spotted in a given territory. The second type, more applicable to the situation in Libya, is when an outside power possessing overwhelming air superiority restricts flights over a given country in order to discourage an internal conflict or humanitarian crisis. This is a relatively recent tactic, which was used most famously in Bosnia and Iraq during the 1990s. No-fly zones are often a compromise in situations where the international community is demanding a response to ongoing violence, but full military interven...