Skip to main content

Obama the Sphinx

"Why is the most civil rights-sensitive of recent US presidents so disturbingly tone-deaf to Egypt's latest cry for freedom?

Whether it likes it or not, the US - assisted by its Western allies - is making strategic choices in the Arab world. Even as it dithers and totters, its spokesmen initially uttering vague condemnations and half-hearted calls for change, Washington is taking sides. Even as Barack Obama called on Hosni Mubarak "to do the right thing", his special envoy to Cairo, Frank Wisner, declared that "Mubarak should remain in power to oversee transition".

An op-ed piece in The Age addresses Obama's failure to deal with the present situation in Egypt - and the Middle East as a whole.

"Judging by the unfolding events, what the US administration means appears to be the reverse: it is not up to the Egyptian people to say who will lead Egypt. The tragedy is that prolonging the agony and delaying the inevitable is costing blood in Tahrir Square, as we have seen over the past few days. By not acting decisively on the side of the Cairo protesters - now that the will of the people is being confronted head on by Mubarak's organised supporters - Washington has missed yet another opportunity to build a healthier relationship with the Arab world.

It is the saddest and most dangerous of strategic choices by Washington, one that is made under pressure of events, dominated by the same jaded view of the Middle East that has governed US policy for decades.

This is a short-sighted and morally reckless view that sees the entire Arab world with its 340 million people as, at best, a source of crude oil and an inconvenience to 7 million Israelis, or at worst, a constant source of threat to Israel's security.

This attitude is partly responsible for some of the dictatorships that have sprung up in the Arab world, with their Faustian offer of "stability" and "security", an offer which, judging by modern Middle Eastern history, has given neither Arabs nor Jews any lasting security."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wow!.....some "visitor" to Ferryland in Newfoundland

It's not at all friendly in United's sky!

More than apt commentary in The Guardian (with video)on United Airline's outrageous conduct so widely reported around the world....

It has become apparent that America’s airlines, much like America’s president, have absolutely no shame. They seem to care only about profit and treat the people they supposedly serve like chattel, cattle or criminals.

This week’s installment of airlines reaching new lows is brought to you by United – you know, the people who spendtens of millions of dollarson fancy adverts urging you to “Fly the Friendly Skies”, while seemingly going out of their way to make the skies as unfriendly as possible. The story has been everywhereover the last 24 hours and you’ve probably seen thegraphic video. United overbooked a flight and, having only realized this after the flight had boarded, tried to force a few randomly selected passengers off. One man refused to vacate the seat he paid for and, thus, had a reasonable expectation of sitting in. Security office…