Skip to main content

The Chaps! - the Dills at the Top

With the carnage created world wide by directors of banks and other companies, it is more than timely to reflect on them and how they achieve their overpaid positions - and their qualifications, if any, to be directors.

Although written from an Australian perspective, this piece "Self-examination of chaps is no standard" in The Age newspaper is timely and applicable to directors everywhere in the world:

"At the end of a recent rowdy annual meeting of shareholders for an ASX-listed company, an elderly woman turned to me and said: "This board of directors is like a group of badly behaved teenage boys in their mid-60s."

She was understandably perplexed after witnessing a dismal attempt to defend a contentious remuneration report, and it brought home to me two critical characteristics that have bypassed the world of company directors: compulsory training in professional standards; and a licence to operate.

When visiting a lawyer, medical practitioner, architect or accountant, the expectation is that the person sitting opposite is thoroughly trained and has satisfied the full and continuing education requirements of an esteemed professional body. Failure to achieve the required standard will result in denial of entry to the field of professional practice, and failing to maintain the standard will result in disqualification.

Company directorships are one of the few noteworthy areas of professional practice for which no formal barrier to entry exists.

A significant informal barrier to entry exists, however, and it operates to exclude all but an intimate few. A scene from a Yes Minister television episode illustrates this. The minister asks a top British bank chairman how he was appointed. "In my walk of life, chaps look after chaps," was the reply."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reading the Chilcot Inquiry Report more closely

Most commentary on the Chilcot Inquiry Report of and associated with the Iraq War, has been "lifted" from the Executive Summary.   The Intercept has actually gone and dug into the Report, with these revelations : "THE CHILCOT REPORT, the U.K.’s official inquiry into its participation in the Iraq War, has finally been released after seven years of investigation. Its executive summary certainly makes former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who led the British push for war, look terrible. According to the report, Blair made statements about Iraq’s nonexistent chemical, biological, and nuclear programs based on “what Mr. Blair believed” rather than the intelligence he had been given. The U.K. went to war despite the fact that “diplomatic options had not been exhausted.” Blair was warned by British intelligence that terrorism would “increase in the event of war, reflecting intensified anti-US/anti-Western sentiment in the Muslim world, including among Muslim communities in the

An unpalatable truth!

Quinoa has for the last years been the "new" food on the block for foodies. Known for its health properties, foodies the world over have taken to it. Many restaurants have added it to their menu. But, as this piece " Can vegans stomach the unpalatable truth about quinoa? " from The Guardian so clearly details, the cost to Bolivians and Peruvians - from where quinoa hails - has been substantial. "Not long ago, quinoa was just an obscure Peruvian grain you could only buy in wholefood shops. We struggled to pronounce it (it's keen-wa, not qui-no-a), yet it was feted by food lovers as a novel addition to the familiar ranks of couscous and rice. Dieticians clucked over quinoa approvingly because it ticked the low-fat box and fitted in with government healthy eating advice to "base your meals on starchy foods". Adventurous eaters liked its slightly bitter taste and the little white curls that formed around the grains. Vegans embraced quinoa as

Climate change: Well-organised hoax?

There are still some - all too sadly people with a voice who are listened to - who assert that climate change is a hoax. Try telling that to the people of Colorado who recently experienced horrendous bushfires, or the people of Croatia suffering with endless days of temps of 40 degrees (and not much less than 30 at night time) some 8-10 degrees above the norm. Bill McKibben, take up the issue of whether climate change is a hoax, on The Daily Beast : Please don’t sweat the 2,132 new high temperature marks in June—remember, climate change is a hoax. The first to figure this out was Oklahoma Senator James Inhofe, who in fact called it “the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people,” apparently topping even the staged moon landing. But others have been catching on. Speaker of the House John Boehner pointed out that the idea that carbon dioxide is “harmful to the environment is almost comical.” The always cautious Mitt Romney scoffed at any damage too: “Scientists will fig