Skip to main content

One can confront the past - and say sorry

Germany did at least the minimum and apologised for its actions during the Holocaust and went further and put its money where it's mouth is by paying compensation to Jewish victims of the Nazi regime and contributing substantial monies to development of Israel.

Switch to Australia. PM Howard steadfastly refuses to say sorry for the actions of governments down the line towards Australia's indigenous people. Not even what are now called the Stolen Generation can elicit an apology from the PM and his Government.

Interestingly, as the LA Times reports, the Spanish Government proposes to openly confront the Franco era:

"Spain will take a major step in confronting its past today when parliament unveils legislation aimed at granting justice to hundreds of thousands of long-neglected victims of the Spanish Civil War and the Franco dictatorship.

Debated fiercely for more than a year, the bill contains the most explicit formal condemnation to date of Gen. Francisco Franco's four-decade-long regime. Among other things, it requires the removal of statues, plaques and other symbols that honor the deceased dictator.

But facing the past has inflamed passions in this polarized society.

Conservatives bitterly oppose the legislation, saying it only reopens wounds better left undisturbed, while some victims and their families are unhappy that the measure does not go further.

Thirty-two years after Franco died, and 71 years after the fascist general took part in a coup against an elected leftist government, igniting a devastating civil war, Spain is undergoing an unprecedented examination of that period's brutalities."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Pentagon's eye-popping spending....and waste!

Only a gigantic bureaucracy could get away with spending of such dimensions - and the amazing waste involved in part of that ginormous spend.   Think US Pentagon..... "From spending $150 million on private villas for a handful of personnel in Afghanistan to blowing $2.7 billion on an air surveillance balloon that doesn’t work, the latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.  Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars' worth of weapons components that will never be used. And then there’s the one that would have to be everyone’s favorite Pentagon waste story: the spending of $50,000 to investigate the bomb-detecting capabilities of African elephants. (And here’s a shock: they didn’t turn out to be that great!) The elephant research, of course, represe...

Video: Israel demolishing a Bedouin village

From Mondoweiss - Israel's supposed "most moral army in the world", the IDF, engaged in immoral, and according to international law, illegal action.... "Israeli forces have demolished every home in the Bedouin village of Khirbet Taha in the northern West Bank district of Nablus during three separate demolitions since the start of the year. Unlike most Bedouin villages, the residents in Khirbet Taha own their own land. However that land falls in Area C, territory in the occupied West Bank under full Israeli control. The village’s only school was also destroyed, leaving children to study in a dilapidated 100-year-old mosque — the only structure left standing in the village. According the United Nations, Israel has demolished half as many Palestinian buildings in the first few months of 2016, as they had in all of 2015. In February alone, the UN found that more Palestinians homes were destroyed than any other month since 2009, when the organization began its docum...

What does a no-fly zone actually mean?

As some countries consider imposing a no-fly zone in relation to Libya, the pertinent question must be what does that mean and entail? FP provides the answers: "It depends on the circumstances. There are two primary types of no-fly zones imposed by air forces. The first is imposed by one military over another, while the two sides are at war. In practice, this type of no-fly zone amounts to a warning from one side that it will engage the other's aircraft if they are spotted in a given territory. The second type, more applicable to the situation in Libya, is when an outside power possessing overwhelming air superiority restricts flights over a given country in order to discourage an internal conflict or humanitarian crisis. This is a relatively recent tactic, which was used most famously in Bosnia and Iraq during the 1990s. No-fly zones are often a compromise in situations where the international community is demanding a response to ongoing violence, but full military interven...