Skip to main content

The Galumphing Mad Monk

Mike Carlton, in his irrepressible best style in his weekly piece in the SMH reflects on Tony Abbott's past week:

"On a visit to the Vatican museum a few years ago, I was shown down a long corridor lined with classical statuary, mostly of male nudes. Oddly, all the penises were missing. The guide explained that some demented medieval cardinal had run amok one night and smashed the sinful members with a hammer.

This colourful snippet of history popped into my head as I watched the galumphing progress of Tony "The Mad Monk" Abbott on the campaign trail this week. Chaos followed his every plodding step.

First he called the Tasmanian Health Minister a liar on radio. Then there was the gratuitous insult to Bernie Banton, the heroic asbestosis victim. After that, we had the late arrival for the TV debate with Labor's health spokeswoman, Nicola Roxon, followed by the sotto voce "bullshit" during the closing exchange of teeth-grinding unpleasantries. Finally, we had the news that he had comprehensively botched the much-trumpeted federal takeover of the Mersey hospital in Tasmania. One of the locals there gave him a public bollocking into the bargain.

It was a veritable orgy of political penis smashing, followed by a fusillade of apologies. It smothered the Prime Minister's attempts to throw more money at old folks and something or other in the health system."

Read on here.......

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Pentagon's eye-popping spending....and waste!

Only a gigantic bureaucracy could get away with spending of such dimensions - and the amazing waste involved in part of that ginormous spend.   Think US Pentagon..... "From spending $150 million on private villas for a handful of personnel in Afghanistan to blowing $2.7 billion on an air surveillance balloon that doesn’t work, the latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.  Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars' worth of weapons components that will never be used. And then there’s the one that would have to be everyone’s favorite Pentagon waste story: the spending of $50,000 to investigate the bomb-detecting capabilities of African elephants. (And here’s a shock: they didn’t turn out to be that great!) The elephant research, of course, represe...

Video: Israel demolishing a Bedouin village

From Mondoweiss - Israel's supposed "most moral army in the world", the IDF, engaged in immoral, and according to international law, illegal action.... "Israeli forces have demolished every home in the Bedouin village of Khirbet Taha in the northern West Bank district of Nablus during three separate demolitions since the start of the year. Unlike most Bedouin villages, the residents in Khirbet Taha own their own land. However that land falls in Area C, territory in the occupied West Bank under full Israeli control. The village’s only school was also destroyed, leaving children to study in a dilapidated 100-year-old mosque — the only structure left standing in the village. According the United Nations, Israel has demolished half as many Palestinian buildings in the first few months of 2016, as they had in all of 2015. In February alone, the UN found that more Palestinians homes were destroyed than any other month since 2009, when the organization began its docum...

What does a no-fly zone actually mean?

As some countries consider imposing a no-fly zone in relation to Libya, the pertinent question must be what does that mean and entail? FP provides the answers: "It depends on the circumstances. There are two primary types of no-fly zones imposed by air forces. The first is imposed by one military over another, while the two sides are at war. In practice, this type of no-fly zone amounts to a warning from one side that it will engage the other's aircraft if they are spotted in a given territory. The second type, more applicable to the situation in Libya, is when an outside power possessing overwhelming air superiority restricts flights over a given country in order to discourage an internal conflict or humanitarian crisis. This is a relatively recent tactic, which was used most famously in Bosnia and Iraq during the 1990s. No-fly zones are often a compromise in situations where the international community is demanding a response to ongoing violence, but full military interven...