Skip to main content

George W flunks the test

Whilst Americans have this rather odd veneration for the institution of their Presidency, the present incumbent is much on the nose. The opinion polls rate him poorly. Even that aside, many people pour scorn on the intellectual capacity - some would even ask what intellectual capacity? - of George W. That he isn't all that bright has been demonstrated in many ways during his presidency.

Steven Casey is senior lecturer in international history at the London School of Economics and Political Science. In a talk at the Lowy Institute he assessed George W. Based on that talk the SMH published an op-ed piece on Casey's score-card for the US President:

"As the Bush presidency approaches its final year, George Bush and his allies are turning their minds towards the verdict of history. How will historians judge him? Will they be kinder than contemporaries? The answer, it is clear, will be a resounding no.

True, historians will not carry the same baggage as the partisans of today. They will have the benefit of distance. But, ultimately, they will compare Bush to other war presidents of American history. And this is very bad news for Bush.

It is tempting to begin with the easy analogy. The only other 20th century president from Texas, Lyndon Johnson, has been given low marks for his Vietnam record. Like Bush, he plunged the US into war on a flimsy pretext, then saw his opinion ratings slide as the conflict bogged down in a debilitating stalemate, before handing over the whole inconclusive mess to his successor. Historians have judged Johnson harshly; surely they will mete out the same treatment to Bush.

Yet in one crucial area, this analogy breaks down. As a war leader, Johnson's central flaws were at the tactical level: he tried to micromanage the fighting. For all his faults, Bush will never be indicted on this score.

Bush's flaws are much graver. They have been at the strategic, rather than tactical, level. Whereas Johnson inherited the Vietnam mess from Harry Truman, Dwight Eisenhower and John F. Kennedy and could see no easy way out, after September 11 Bush operated from a strategic clean slate. It was his responsibility to set the basic direction for the so-called war on terror. And it is here that his record compares most unfavourably with his predecessors."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Robert Fisk's predictions for the Middle East in 2013

There is no gain-saying that Robert Fisk, fiercely independent and feisty to boot, is the veteran journalist and author covering the Middle East. Who doesn't he know or hasn't he met over the years in reporting from Beirut - where he lives?  In his latest op-ed piece for The Independent he lays out his predictions for the Middle East for 2013. Read the piece in full, here - well worthwhile - but an extract... "Never make predictions in the Middle East. My crystal ball broke long ago. But predicting the region has an honourable pedigree. “An Arab movement, newly-risen, is looming in the distance,” a French traveller to the Gulf and Baghdad wrote in 1883, “and a race hitherto downtrodden will presently claim its due place in the destinies of Islam.” A year earlier, a British diplomat in Jeddah confided that “it is within my knowledge... that the idea of freedom does at present agitate some minds even in Mecca...” So let’s say this for 2013: the “Arab Awakening” (the t

The NPT (Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty) goes on hold.....because of one non-Treaty member (Israel)

Isn't there something radically wrong here?    Israel, a non-signatory to the NPT has, evidently, been the cause for those countries that are Treaty members, notably Canada, the US and the UK, after 4 weeks of negotiation, effectively blocking off any meaningful progress in ensuring the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons.    IPS reports ..... "After nearly four weeks of negotiations, the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) Review Conference ended in a predictable outcome: a text overwhelmingly reflecting the views and interests of the nuclear-armed states and some of their nuclear-dependent allies. “The process to develop the draft Review Conference outcome document was anti-democratic and nontransparent,” Ray Acheson, director, Reaching Critical Will, Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF), told IPS. “This Review Conference has demonstrated beyond any doubt that continuing to rely on the nuclear-armed states or their nuclear-dependent allies for l

#1 Prize for a bizarre story.....and lying!

No comment called for in this piece from CommonDreams: Another young black man: The strange sad case of 21-year-old Chavis Carter. Police in Jonesboro, Arkansas  stopped  him and two friends, found some marijuana, searched put Carter, then put him handcuffed  behind his back  into their patrol car, where they say he  shot himself  in the head with a gun they failed to find. The FBI is investigating. Police Chief Michael Yates, who stands behind his officers' story,  says in an interview  that the death is "definitely bizarre and defies logic at first glance." You think?