Skip to main content

Hypocrisy writ large!

John Howard and his minions continue to bray about Kevin Rudd. He isn't honest, etc. etc. Coming from John Howard - he who faced an electoral campaign last election directly challenging his honesty [remember Not Happy John?] - it's all a bit rich and hypocritical.

In her blog in The Australian Caroline Overington hits the nail on the head:

"It is too easy to get cynical about politics in an election year but, from time to time, you read something in the papers that is so hideously hypocritical it makes the toast fall out of your mouth.

Yesterday’s newspapers carried the news that John Howard had “sacrificed” a cabinet minister, Ian Campbell, for - get this - having a 20-minute meeting with a man called Brian Burke.

Now Burke is a dodgy dude, no doubt about it. He’s a former premier of Western Australia who spent time in the slammer, he clearly eats too much and he wears bad hats. The Labor Party once banned all contact with him by any of its members - but he has been out of jail for 10 years and the Liberal Party never had a ban on meeting him.

Still, Campbell, the human services minister, got the boot for seeing him for less than 30 minutes on a matter of some importance to his then environment portfolio. Let’s make the obvious comparison: as far as we know, Burke doesn’t send money to odious regimes. He doesn’t do deals with countries - like, say, Iraq - that Australia is about to invade. We know who did that - it was Australia’s wheat exporter, AWB. They’ve admitted it and apologised for it.

Two of John Howard’s most senior colleagues, Alexander Downer and Mark Vaile, had ministerial responsibility for the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade at the time of the Iraq kickback scandal. They admit that they were told and told - and told again - that AWB was up to its neck in corruption."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reading the Chilcot Inquiry Report more closely

Most commentary on the Chilcot Inquiry Report of and associated with the Iraq War, has been "lifted" from the Executive Summary.   The Intercept has actually gone and dug into the Report, with these revelations : "THE CHILCOT REPORT, the U.K.’s official inquiry into its participation in the Iraq War, has finally been released after seven years of investigation. Its executive summary certainly makes former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who led the British push for war, look terrible. According to the report, Blair made statements about Iraq’s nonexistent chemical, biological, and nuclear programs based on “what Mr. Blair believed” rather than the intelligence he had been given. The U.K. went to war despite the fact that “diplomatic options had not been exhausted.” Blair was warned by British intelligence that terrorism would “increase in the event of war, reflecting intensified anti-US/anti-Western sentiment in the Muslim world, including among Muslim communities in the

Robert Fisk's predictions for the Middle East in 2013

There is no gain-saying that Robert Fisk, fiercely independent and feisty to boot, is the veteran journalist and author covering the Middle East. Who doesn't he know or hasn't he met over the years in reporting from Beirut - where he lives?  In his latest op-ed piece for The Independent he lays out his predictions for the Middle East for 2013. Read the piece in full, here - well worthwhile - but an extract... "Never make predictions in the Middle East. My crystal ball broke long ago. But predicting the region has an honourable pedigree. “An Arab movement, newly-risen, is looming in the distance,” a French traveller to the Gulf and Baghdad wrote in 1883, “and a race hitherto downtrodden will presently claim its due place in the destinies of Islam.” A year earlier, a British diplomat in Jeddah confided that “it is within my knowledge... that the idea of freedom does at present agitate some minds even in Mecca...” So let’s say this for 2013: the “Arab Awakening” (the t

An unpalatable truth!

Quinoa has for the last years been the "new" food on the block for foodies. Known for its health properties, foodies the world over have taken to it. Many restaurants have added it to their menu. But, as this piece " Can vegans stomach the unpalatable truth about quinoa? " from The Guardian so clearly details, the cost to Bolivians and Peruvians - from where quinoa hails - has been substantial. "Not long ago, quinoa was just an obscure Peruvian grain you could only buy in wholefood shops. We struggled to pronounce it (it's keen-wa, not qui-no-a), yet it was feted by food lovers as a novel addition to the familiar ranks of couscous and rice. Dieticians clucked over quinoa approvingly because it ticked the low-fat box and fitted in with government healthy eating advice to "base your meals on starchy foods". Adventurous eaters liked its slightly bitter taste and the little white curls that formed around the grains. Vegans embraced quinoa as