Skip to main content

Time well past for shutting down Guantanamo

truthout  in "Time to Close Guantanamo" on Gitmo and all the appalling negatives about it....

"As Syria, Iran and US politics have dominated the media in the past weeks, the continuing plight of Guantanamo's prisoners has receded from public consciousness. The shame of those prisons continues to hang over America. The denial of justice through indefinite detention and flawed trial procedures casts doubt on our country's professed allegiance to the rule of law.

In his September 24, 2013, speech to the UN General Assembly, President Obama alluded to Guantanamo. He said: "We are transferring detainees to other countries and trying terrorists in courts of law, while working diligently to close the prison at Guantanamo Bay." 
Yet to this day:
  • The president has released only two prisoners (both Algerian) since his May 23 lifting of the moritorium on transfers to Yemen.

  • Even though 84 prisoners, determined to be not a danger, were cleared for release in January 2010 by an inter-agency Guantanamo Review Task Force, no further prisoners have been freed.
  • Of the 164 current "detainees" in Guantanamo, no more than 26 are considered as "significant threats." The remaining 138 (many of whom were rounded up and sold to the US military for bounty) have not been charged with any crime.
  • The decade long detention, without end in sight, has given rise to a hopelessness and despair that largely prompted the hunger strike begun in February 2013. To surpress the strike, prison authorities punished participants with forced feedings, lockdowns and solitary confinement.

When interrupted by a Code Pink protester during his remarks at the National Defense University on May 23, 2013, the president condemned that detainees are being force-fed. "Look at the current situation, where we are force-feeding detainees who are being held on a hunger strike. ... Is this who we are? ... Is that the America we want to leave our children? Our sense of justice is stronger than that."

If so, why are 18 Guantanamo prisoners still being force-fed? Why are defense counsels in military commissions constrained in accessing and communicating with their clients? Why is the Guantanamo prison still operating?"

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Pentagon's eye-popping spending....and waste!

Only a gigantic bureaucracy could get away with spending of such dimensions - and the amazing waste involved in part of that ginormous spend.   Think US Pentagon..... "From spending $150 million on private villas for a handful of personnel in Afghanistan to blowing $2.7 billion on an air surveillance balloon that doesn’t work, the latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.  Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars' worth of weapons components that will never be used. And then there’s the one that would have to be everyone’s favorite Pentagon waste story: the spending of $50,000 to investigate the bomb-detecting capabilities of African elephants. (And here’s a shock: they didn’t turn out to be that great!) The elephant research, of course, represe...
Post a Comment
Read more

Video: Israel demolishing a Bedouin village

From Mondoweiss - Israel's supposed "most moral army in the world", the IDF, engaged in immoral, and according to international law, illegal action.... "Israeli forces have demolished every home in the Bedouin village of Khirbet Taha in the northern West Bank district of Nablus during three separate demolitions since the start of the year. Unlike most Bedouin villages, the residents in Khirbet Taha own their own land. However that land falls in Area C, territory in the occupied West Bank under full Israeli control. The village’s only school was also destroyed, leaving children to study in a dilapidated 100-year-old mosque — the only structure left standing in the village. According the United Nations, Israel has demolished half as many Palestinian buildings in the first few months of 2016, as they had in all of 2015. In February alone, the UN found that more Palestinians homes were destroyed than any other month since 2009, when the organization began its docum...
Post a Comment
Read more

What does a no-fly zone actually mean?

As some countries consider imposing a no-fly zone in relation to Libya, the pertinent question must be what does that mean and entail? FP provides the answers: "It depends on the circumstances. There are two primary types of no-fly zones imposed by air forces. The first is imposed by one military over another, while the two sides are at war. In practice, this type of no-fly zone amounts to a warning from one side that it will engage the other's aircraft if they are spotted in a given territory. The second type, more applicable to the situation in Libya, is when an outside power possessing overwhelming air superiority restricts flights over a given country in order to discourage an internal conflict or humanitarian crisis. This is a relatively recent tactic, which was used most famously in Bosnia and Iraq during the 1990s. No-fly zones are often a compromise in situations where the international community is demanding a response to ongoing violence, but full military interven...
6 comments
Read more