Skip to main content

Forget about using antibiotics

This ought to be of grave concern to everyone.......we are out there on our own without antibiotics.   And all caused by ourselves!

"We’ve reached the limits of medicine’s effectiveness. Thanks to overmedication and the abuse of antibiotics in the agriculture industry, there are infections that can no longer be treated with antibiotics. And there’s nothing left to do except maybe hope for the best.

According to Dr. Arjun Srinivasan, an associate director at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, we now live in a post-antibiotic era in which drug-resistant bacteria are invincible. In an interview this week on PBS, Srinivasan discussed how we got to the point at which patients who could once be cured by an antibiotic are now left without any options. Srinivasan notes that for a while some media have been speculating whether the “end of antibiotics” was nigh. Now, the doctor says, “You can change the title to ‘The end of antibiotics, period.’ ” Willy Blackmore, food editor of TakePart, a news website that focuses on social justice, discusses the interview:

The lengthy interview focuses largely on the use—and abuse—of antibiotics in the human context, but America’s largest consumers of these drugs, livestock, are unwittingly contributing to this growing public health risk too.

“There have been a number of studies that show that when you give antibiotics to animals, especially to animals that we then eat, there are antibiotics that get into their systems that can develop resistance,” Dr. Srinivasan says, “and then when we eat the food, we can be exposed to those resistant organisms.”

Just this week industry watchdogs made their latest call for a ban on non-therapeutic use of antibiotics in animals raised for food. The oft-repeated recommendation was part of a report published by the John Hopkins Center for a Liveable Future, which also found that the influence of industrial ag and the pharmaceutical industry has on iron-grip on policy discussions—and wields outsized influence over academia and the government’s regulation and enforcement efforts.

With 30 million pounds of antibiotics sold to agriculture industry in 2011, it’s a massive market to protect.

So no matter how careful you were to take medication only as prescribed, or how often you turned to home remedies to fight off bacteria, antibiotics have been sneaking into your organism. And it all comes down to profiteering industries valuing money over health.

Blackmore ponders whether the fact that we’ve reached such an extreme will bring about any change in the agricultural industry. “Considering that the Food and Drug Administration first voiced concern over the use of antibiotics in meat production in the mid-1960s,” Blackmore grimly states, “it’s difficult to be hopeful.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Pentagon's eye-popping spending....and waste!

Only a gigantic bureaucracy could get away with spending of such dimensions - and the amazing waste involved in part of that ginormous spend.   Think US Pentagon..... "From spending $150 million on private villas for a handful of personnel in Afghanistan to blowing $2.7 billion on an air surveillance balloon that doesn’t work, the latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.  Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars' worth of weapons components that will never be used. And then there’s the one that would have to be everyone’s favorite Pentagon waste story: the spending of $50,000 to investigate the bomb-detecting capabilities of African elephants. (And here’s a shock: they didn’t turn out to be that great!) The elephant research, of course, represe...

Video: Israel demolishing a Bedouin village

From Mondoweiss - Israel's supposed "most moral army in the world", the IDF, engaged in immoral, and according to international law, illegal action.... "Israeli forces have demolished every home in the Bedouin village of Khirbet Taha in the northern West Bank district of Nablus during three separate demolitions since the start of the year. Unlike most Bedouin villages, the residents in Khirbet Taha own their own land. However that land falls in Area C, territory in the occupied West Bank under full Israeli control. The village’s only school was also destroyed, leaving children to study in a dilapidated 100-year-old mosque — the only structure left standing in the village. According the United Nations, Israel has demolished half as many Palestinian buildings in the first few months of 2016, as they had in all of 2015. In February alone, the UN found that more Palestinians homes were destroyed than any other month since 2009, when the organization began its docum...

What does a no-fly zone actually mean?

As some countries consider imposing a no-fly zone in relation to Libya, the pertinent question must be what does that mean and entail? FP provides the answers: "It depends on the circumstances. There are two primary types of no-fly zones imposed by air forces. The first is imposed by one military over another, while the two sides are at war. In practice, this type of no-fly zone amounts to a warning from one side that it will engage the other's aircraft if they are spotted in a given territory. The second type, more applicable to the situation in Libya, is when an outside power possessing overwhelming air superiority restricts flights over a given country in order to discourage an internal conflict or humanitarian crisis. This is a relatively recent tactic, which was used most famously in Bosnia and Iraq during the 1990s. No-fly zones are often a compromise in situations where the international community is demanding a response to ongoing violence, but full military interven...