Skip to main content

Don't think you are really secure

Pause for thought that after all those billions spent on security at airports in the US, a Report just out doesn't give one any confidence that all the hoop-la surrounding what has been introduced is really effective - let alone been worth the money spent.

"A vast government bureaucracy and hundreds of billions of dollars a decade after the 9-11 attacks did not prevent a dubious grade for American safety from terrorists, according to a new security report.

The report released Wednesday morning in Washington D.C. comes from the 9/11 Commission, which is devoted to protecting Americans from terrorist attacks.

The assessment does show some improvements over a report card issued just after the 9/11 Commission’s recommendations. That report card, also compiled by former members of the 9/11 Commission, assigned the government a series of failing letter grades — five F’s, 12 D’s and two “incompletes.”

“A decade after 9-11, the nation is not yet prepared for a truly catastrophic disaster,” said the new report called “Tenth Anniversary Report Card: The Status of 9-11 Commission Recommendations.”

The new report was chaired by former New Jersey Gov. Thomas Kean and former Rep. Lee Hamilton of Indiana.

The newest “Report Card” did not issue grades. But it covered the 41 recommendations made in 2004 by the 9/11 commission. Of the 41, nine have been inadequately implemented or not implemented at all, said the authors. The report also found various inadequacies:

Police and fire used different frequencies during 9-11. According to the commission, that problem still exists. It blames congress for not allocating new broadcast frequencies for common use by all so-called “first responders.”

The TSA still does not have the capacity to detect concealed weapons.

America’s ability to detect explosives hidden on passengers boarding airplanes “lacks reliability.”

The report said Homeland Security’s new full-body scanners are not effective (as officials claimed) at detecting hidden explosives.

The type of state legislation to prevent hijackers who in the past got state-issued ID’s to board airlines has been repeatedly delayed. Compliance has been pushed back over and over until the date is now 2013.

Prior recommendations that the government fingerprint visa holders as they leave the country that raised objections because of its high costs have also been ignored.

Some observers say many of the anti-terror recommendations have been pushed aside or delayed because of cost or because they ran afoul of privacy and civil liberty concerns.

“Until some of these things are done, we aren’t going to be as safe as we should be,” Kean said in an interview with the Tribune. He called it “outrageous” that the US Congress has not dealt legislatively with some of the problems.

The report cites some positive developments such as significant progress in improving homeland security, notably in the case of intelligence sharing and in the overall screening of airline passengers.

The new report is far from alone in the latest governmental findings stemming from the 9-11 attacks.

There’s an investigation into charities established to serve families of the victims. There’s also a series of intelligence hearings on Capitol Hill. Finally, there’s a national report on the various state’s plans to protect children in the event of another similar disaster."


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Pentagon's eye-popping spending....and waste!

Only a gigantic bureaucracy could get away with spending of such dimensions - and the amazing waste involved in part of that ginormous spend.   Think US Pentagon..... "From spending $150 million on private villas for a handful of personnel in Afghanistan to blowing $2.7 billion on an air surveillance balloon that doesn’t work, the latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.  Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars' worth of weapons components that will never be used. And then there’s the one that would have to be everyone’s favorite Pentagon waste story: the spending of $50,000 to investigate the bomb-detecting capabilities of African elephants. (And here’s a shock: they didn’t turn out to be that great!) The elephant research, of course, represe...

Video: Israel demolishing a Bedouin village

From Mondoweiss - Israel's supposed "most moral army in the world", the IDF, engaged in immoral, and according to international law, illegal action.... "Israeli forces have demolished every home in the Bedouin village of Khirbet Taha in the northern West Bank district of Nablus during three separate demolitions since the start of the year. Unlike most Bedouin villages, the residents in Khirbet Taha own their own land. However that land falls in Area C, territory in the occupied West Bank under full Israeli control. The village’s only school was also destroyed, leaving children to study in a dilapidated 100-year-old mosque — the only structure left standing in the village. According the United Nations, Israel has demolished half as many Palestinian buildings in the first few months of 2016, as they had in all of 2015. In February alone, the UN found that more Palestinians homes were destroyed than any other month since 2009, when the organization began its docum...

What does a no-fly zone actually mean?

As some countries consider imposing a no-fly zone in relation to Libya, the pertinent question must be what does that mean and entail? FP provides the answers: "It depends on the circumstances. There are two primary types of no-fly zones imposed by air forces. The first is imposed by one military over another, while the two sides are at war. In practice, this type of no-fly zone amounts to a warning from one side that it will engage the other's aircraft if they are spotted in a given territory. The second type, more applicable to the situation in Libya, is when an outside power possessing overwhelming air superiority restricts flights over a given country in order to discourage an internal conflict or humanitarian crisis. This is a relatively recent tactic, which was used most famously in Bosnia and Iraq during the 1990s. No-fly zones are often a compromise in situations where the international community is demanding a response to ongoing violence, but full military interven...