Skip to main content

The White House Has Got Mail — Um, It Had Mail

Need any more be said about the antics of the Bush White House? - as the blog of The Board [that is, the editorial Board] of the NY Times details:

"As the Bush administration fades into history, a federal lawsuit is establishing that astonishing chunks of this history have already gone missing.

The White House admitted in court this week that it has no back-up archives for missing email messages covering a crucial period in 2003.

The email gaps coincide with critical events like the run-up to the Iraq war that was driven by incorrect intelligence; the Machiavellian stratagem to leak the identity of the former C.I.A. operative Valerie Plame Wilson; and various unspecified activities involving Karl Rove, President Bush’s former political field general.

By law, the missing policy and political communications belong to the taxpayers and must be preserved by the government for posterity. But the White House claims a “primitive” preservation system caused the e-mails to slip away — not any deliberate, post-facto purging by officials worried about the judgment of history.

Initially, the White House admitted hundreds of days of emails were missing, according to reports from a closed congressional hearing. These included 12 work days with no e-mails at all for President Bush’s immediate office and 16 days for Vice President Dick Cheney. Since then, officials have sought to minimize the problem, relying on a search for backup archives. But the administration’s latest court statement raises the possibility that, in one vital three-month period, emails before and after the Iraq invasion may never be found."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Pentagon's eye-popping spending....and waste!

Only a gigantic bureaucracy could get away with spending of such dimensions - and the amazing waste involved in part of that ginormous spend.   Think US Pentagon..... "From spending $150 million on private villas for a handful of personnel in Afghanistan to blowing $2.7 billion on an air surveillance balloon that doesn’t work, the latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.  Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars' worth of weapons components that will never be used. And then there’s the one that would have to be everyone’s favorite Pentagon waste story: the spending of $50,000 to investigate the bomb-detecting capabilities of African elephants. (And here’s a shock: they didn’t turn out to be that great!) The elephant research, of course, represe...

Video: Israel demolishing a Bedouin village

From Mondoweiss - Israel's supposed "most moral army in the world", the IDF, engaged in immoral, and according to international law, illegal action.... "Israeli forces have demolished every home in the Bedouin village of Khirbet Taha in the northern West Bank district of Nablus during three separate demolitions since the start of the year. Unlike most Bedouin villages, the residents in Khirbet Taha own their own land. However that land falls in Area C, territory in the occupied West Bank under full Israeli control. The village’s only school was also destroyed, leaving children to study in a dilapidated 100-year-old mosque — the only structure left standing in the village. According the United Nations, Israel has demolished half as many Palestinian buildings in the first few months of 2016, as they had in all of 2015. In February alone, the UN found that more Palestinians homes were destroyed than any other month since 2009, when the organization began its docum...

What does a no-fly zone actually mean?

As some countries consider imposing a no-fly zone in relation to Libya, the pertinent question must be what does that mean and entail? FP provides the answers: "It depends on the circumstances. There are two primary types of no-fly zones imposed by air forces. The first is imposed by one military over another, while the two sides are at war. In practice, this type of no-fly zone amounts to a warning from one side that it will engage the other's aircraft if they are spotted in a given territory. The second type, more applicable to the situation in Libya, is when an outside power possessing overwhelming air superiority restricts flights over a given country in order to discourage an internal conflict or humanitarian crisis. This is a relatively recent tactic, which was used most famously in Bosnia and Iraq during the 1990s. No-fly zones are often a compromise in situations where the international community is demanding a response to ongoing violence, but full military interven...