Skip to main content

Britain's shameful and disgraceful treatment of its refugees

Ignore the pious, pompous words of Britain's PM, David Cameron - how it is the UK does things things humanely and with compassion - and read how what is supposed to be a civilised First world country treats its refugees.    Shameful and disgraceful.....

"Children forced to sleep on a concrete floor, patients with diarrhoea denied access to showers, trafficking victims locked up without food, a naked woman allegedly beaten in a detention centre: this is how government officials are accused of treating asylum seekers in 2016. And it’s not in war-torn Libya or cash-strapped Lebanon, but in Britain.

A new report accuses officials of gross negligence or abuse in their treatment of asylum seekers. Written by the chief inspector of prisons, the study finds that hundreds of asylum seekers, including those from Syria, were held in “wholly unacceptable” conditions on the floor of a freight shed in Kent.

Separately, the Home Office is investigating claims that a woman at the Yarl’s Wood detention centre was filmed being dragged naked by a group of asylum officers, and punched twice.

A campaign just launched by Women for Refugee Women, highlighting the incarceration of dozens of pregnant women in Yarl’s Wood, suggests that the callous treatment of people in the centre is not an isolated incident.

Having reported from most of the flashpoints of the refugee crisis over the past year, this isn’t the first time I’ve read about or witnessed this kind of treatment. In detention centres in Libya, one of the 18 countries I visited last year along the migration trail, I saw hundreds of failed asylum seekers – some of them pregnant – crammed into squalid cells with no access to sanitation. Many alleged they’d been beaten, and some said they had witnessed rape.

I had expected to see such desperate scenes in Libya. It is a war-ravaged country run by dozens of militias. It lacks a functioning state, and what institutions are left have few resources to look after asylum seekers, who are often arrested on an ad hoc basis.

While Britain’s humanitarian record has never been particularly clean, it is still shocking to read of Libyan-style treatment – of pregnant women locked up with little legal recourse, of naked women allegedly manhandled, and of children sleeping in their wet clothes in dirty containers – on British shores. Any country is capable of depravity. But unlike Libya, Britain – with its huge resources, stability and administrative capacity – has no excuse.

This is just the latest example of Britain stooping to the level of failing countries in its response to the greatest humanitarian challenge of our times. And yet the alleged inability to provide adequate care to asylum seekers landing in Kent, or locked up in Yarl’s Wood, masks what is perhaps a much deeper ethical lapse: the failure to resettle significant numbers of refugees directly from the Middle East, and the expectation that Middle Eastern countries should instead shoulder the refugee burden themselves.

Britain has promised to take in just 4,000 refugees a year for the next five years, on the basis that the country – with a population of around 65 million – cannot absorb any more foreigners. Instead, Britain expects countries such as Lebanon, with a population of just 4.5 million, to manage a million refugees.

To put Britain’s limp effort into further context: in the month that this decision was made – last September – more refugees landed on the Greek islands every single day than the UK will admit in the whole of 2016."


Popular posts from this blog

Donald T: First seduced..... then betrayed!

All those supporters of Trump - who, heaven's only knows, got him headed for the White House - are in a for more than a rude awakening and shock.   Whatever Trump "promised" is just not going to Paul Krugman so clearly spells out in his latest op-ed piece "Seduced and Betrayed by Donald Trump" in The New York Times.

"Donald Trump won the Electoral College (though not the popular vote) on the strength of overwhelming support from working-class whites, who feel left behind by a changing economy and society. And they’re about to get their reward — the same reward that, throughout Mr. Trump’s career, has come to everyone who trusted his good intentions. Think Trump University.

Yes, the white working class is about to be betrayed.

The evidence of that coming betrayal is obvious in the choice of an array of pro-corporate, anti-labor figures for key positions. In particular, the most important story of the week — seriously, people, stop focusing on Trum…

Snooping..... at its worst

The Brits have just brought in legislation which allows for unprecedented "snooping" in a Western democracy - says Edward Snowden.   Let truthdig explain....

"On Tuesday, the United Kingdom instated the Investigatory Powers Act 2016, a piece of legislation described by whistleblower Edward Snowden as “the most extreme surveillance in the history of western democracy.”

The law, informally known as the “Snooper’s Charter,” spent over a year in Parliament before it was passed. The Guardian reported:

"The new surveillance law requires web and phone companies to store everyone’s web browsing histories for 12 months and give the police, security services and official agencies unprecedented access to the data.

It also provides the security services and police with new powers to hack into computers and phones and to collect communications data in bulk. The law requires judges to sign off police requests to view journalists’ call and web records, but the measure has been descri…

A "Muslim Register"

Outrageous is the word which immediately comes to mind - the idea of a  Muslim Register which Trump has floated.     And how and by or through whom would this Registry comes into being?    Let The Intercept explain.....

"Every American corporation, from the largest conglomerate to the smallest firm, should ask itself right now: Will we do business with the Trump administration to further its most extreme, draconian goals? Or will we resist?

This question is perhaps most important for the country’s tech companies, which are particularly valuable partners for a budding authoritarian. The Intercept contacted nine of the most prominent such firms, from Facebook to Booz Allen Hamilton, to ask if they would sell their services to help create a national Muslim registry, an idea recently resurfaced by Donald Trump’s transition team. Only Twitter said no.

Shortly after the election, IBM CEO Ginni Rometty wrote a personal letter to President-elect Trump in which she offered her congratulation…