Skip to main content

An outsiders's view of a President Trump

For every critic or detractor of Donald Trump, there are many who see him as becoming the next US President.    As this piece (re-printed here in full) in Australia's The Age newspaper clearly shows, at least one outsider fears what will become of the world with Trump in the White House.  

"This year started with one of those fanciful, off-the-wall, left-field, way-out-there possible 'black swan' events - Donald Trump becoming president of the United States.

Two very long months later, that's no longer so fanciful.


I've just spent three weeks in the US and President Trump is looking more pervasive wild duck than exotic black swan.


Tonight, with the Super Tuesday bunch of US state primaries, there's a probability the boastfully racist, sectarian, protectionist Trump will take a very big step closer to winning the Republican nomination. It is his to lose.

The presumed Democrat candidate, Hillary Clinton, is ahead of Trump in the polls but the result of the two-horse race is far from a sure thing.


There's the wildcard factor of voter turnout – only 54.9 per cent last time – in a country where Clinton seems to be as strongly disliked as liked.


And there's the reality of the US being a violent, over-armed society with more than its fair share of right wing extremists. (The Kalamazoo mass shooting on February 20 seemed to receive plenty of coverage because the perp was an Uber driver – the 17 shot in Kansas and three police in Virginia within the week, not so much. Uber wasn't involved.)


President Trump would be scary stuff on any number of fronts.


He promises to be bad for Wall Street as well as international trade and Mexican relations.


The conservative Republican establishment isn't just worried because Trump has promised to take on some of the worst excesses of the party's business backers, as a provocative Rolling Stone profile has documented.


Optimists and Trump apologists claim The Donald's more extreme views are just those of a show-business politician doing whatever it takes to win the US presidential race reality TV show.  And, along with the offensive, dangerous and totally wacky stuff, Trump does have some valid points that appeal to middle and working class Americans who realise they've been going nowhere under both Republicans and Democrats for a couple of decades. 


For a Republican candidate, you could even argue he's a relative liberal.


But for Australia, his protectionism, jingoism and Putin-esque ego are a threat to our wellbeing.
President Trump would rattle our markets and should give pause to our blind loyalty to American foreign policy, causing a reassessment of where our self-interest ultimately lies.


"All the way with Donald Trump" doesn't rhyme and certainly doesn't resonate."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Oh yer?

Credited to Nick Anderson

Donald T: First seduced..... then betrayed!

All those supporters of Trump - who, heaven's only knows, got him headed for the White House - are in a for more than a rude awakening and shock.   Whatever Trump "promised" is just not going to happen....as Paul Krugman so clearly spells out in his latest op-ed piece "Seduced and Betrayed by Donald Trump" in The New York Times.

"Donald Trump won the Electoral College (though not the popular vote) on the strength of overwhelming support from working-class whites, who feel left behind by a changing economy and society. And they’re about to get their reward — the same reward that, throughout Mr. Trump’s career, has come to everyone who trusted his good intentions. Think Trump University.

Yes, the white working class is about to be betrayed.

The evidence of that coming betrayal is obvious in the choice of an array of pro-corporate, anti-labor figures for key positions. In particular, the most important story of the week — seriously, people, stop focusing on Trum…

Snooping..... at its worst

The Brits have just brought in legislation which allows for unprecedented "snooping" in a Western democracy - says Edward Snowden.   Let truthdig explain....

"On Tuesday, the United Kingdom instated the Investigatory Powers Act 2016, a piece of legislation described by whistleblower Edward Snowden as “the most extreme surveillance in the history of western democracy.”

The law, informally known as the “Snooper’s Charter,” spent over a year in Parliament before it was passed. The Guardian reported:

"The new surveillance law requires web and phone companies to store everyone’s web browsing histories for 12 months and give the police, security services and official agencies unprecedented access to the data.

It also provides the security services and police with new powers to hack into computers and phones and to collect communications data in bulk. The law requires judges to sign off police requests to view journalists’ call and web records, but the measure has been descri…