Skip to main content

Michael Hastings: truthdig Truthdigger of the Week

No comment called for.     A deserved honour....

"Every week the Truthdig editorial staff selects a Truthdigger of the Week, a group or person worthy of recognition for speaking truth to power, breaking the story or blowing the whistle. It is not a lifetime achievement award. Rather, we’re looking for newsmakers whose actions in a given week are worth celebrating." 

"Michael Hastings, the American journalist whose 2010 article on Gen. Stanley McChrystal led to the officer’s resignation as head of the coalition forces in Afghanistan, died in a fiery car crash when his Mercedes collided with a palm tree at high speed early Tuesday morning in Los Angeles. We was 33 years old.

Hastings has been described throughout the press as having been a “fearless” reporter. After earning a journalism degree at New York University, he began his career as a reporter for Newsweek, for which he covered the Iraq War during the deadliest years of that conflict. His successes enabled him to become a regular contributor to GQ and a contributing editor at Rolling Stone. In 2012 he was hired as a staff writer and reporter for BuzzFeed. With that site’s support, he covered the presidential campaign.

He was also despised by his more straight-laced colleagues. Guardian national security editor Spencer Ackerman described the way members of the traditional press corps regarded Hastings after his McChrystal profile. In the McChrystal piece, Hastings published disparaging comments made over drinks by the general’s staffers about their civilian leadership in the Obama administration. According to Ackerman, the objections made by journalists in Afghanistan were as follows:

How could Hastings publish off-the-record jibes made by officers who were trying to be welcoming to him, the complaints went; what kind of arrogance led him to want to make a name for himself like this? What was his problem with McChrystal, anyway? Didn’t he know McChrystal was trying to rein in the war?

Ackerman explains that Hastings didn’t publish anything that was explicitly off the record. But few people wanted to explore that issue. Instead, they “simply wanted to feel superior” to him.


What his detractors seemed not to realize was that Hastings was practicing a cold commitment to the journalist’s craft: He recorded what he observed and dutifully reported it to the public, without getting mushy and sanctimonious about the broadly accepted rules of professional propriety that make the work of so many reporters irrelevant and useless to the public."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

One Forbes List: A roll call of criminals, psychopaths and megalomaniacs

2016 has ended and there has been the inevitable list of the best of 2016 of this or that.     

The just published Forbes List of the Most Powerful People is another thing altogether.    It is truly shocking to think that those listed are as downright awful and the worst of humankind has to offer.....yet wield enormous power.     The Age newspaper in "Who's who list a roll call of criminals, psychopaths and megalomaniacs" provides the details.....

"It's that time of the year again. In an effort to celebrate or sum up, or maybe just expunge the events of a year that's just wound up, we've become obsessed with rankings. Top 10 Christmas hits, bestselling books, the most excruciating movie moments, the seven things we're doing to wreak havoc on our planet. This year, courtesy of US presidential election, we also have the top 20 fake news stories, the 10 steps for adjusting to a Trump presidency, and the best destinations for those that find they simply ar…

"Wake Up"

The message is loud and clear....and as you watch this, remember that it was on Israeli TV - not some anti-semitic or anti-Israel program somewhere in the world.


Happy New Year....not?

Credited to Mike Luckovich