Skip to main content

Romney's all the way for war and conflict

Mitt Romney seized the nettle to show his mettle on foreign policy in making a broad-ranging statement on the subject.  What he would do as President, etc. etc.    Pity is - and more than troubling - that it all comes down to one theme.    War or conflict!

"He denounced “the abrupt withdrawal of our entire troop presence” from Iraq, though he didn’t say how long he would have kept our troops there.

And he hinted broadly that he’d keep U.S. troops in Afghanistan beyond 2014. “I will evaluate conditions on the ground and weigh the best advice of our military commanders,” he said. “And I will affirm that my duty is not to my political prospects, but to the security of the nation.”

On Iran, he also threatened war, aligning himself squarely with Benjamin Netanyahu. “I will put the leaders of Iran on notice that the United States and our friends and allies will prevent them from acquiring nuclear weapons capability,” he said. The policy of the Obama Administration has been to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, not the capability to build them. But like Obama at the U.N. in September, Romney threatened war against Iran “for the sake of peace.” George Orwell alert!

As for Israel, Romney said: “The world must never see any daylight between our two nations.” That’s a green light for more Israeli intransigence with the Palestinians.

On China, Romney said its “recent assertiveness is sending chills through the region.” He vowed to “restore our Navy to the size needed to fulfill our missions”—and he said he’d build “15 ships per year, including three submarines.” That would put China on high alert.

And Romney seems eager to relaunch the Cold War. (Romney in April seemed to think the Soviet Union still existed, as he blamed Obama for entering “into an agreement with the Soviets, excuse me, with Russia” on nuclear weapons reductions.) “I will implement effective missile defenses to protect against threats,” he said at the VMI. “And on this there will be no flexibility with Vladimir Putin.” Similar hardline language from Romney earlier in the year only made Putin more stubbornly opposed to missile defenses—and more ready to respond with moves of his own.

Romney’s approach would be sure to kick off a new arms race with Moscow.

A Romney presidency would be a boon for military contractors but no one else."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Big Brother alive and well in the USA in 2007

The so-called "war on terror" has shown itself up in a multitude of manifestations. The most dangerous thing has been governments using the "excuse" of the war to restrict certain civil liberties, allowing government agencies to pursue a variety of things that they would otherwise would not - and should not - be allowed to do and gathering, and retaining, a variety of information on its citizens.

The Washington Post reports on the latest incursions into civil liberties of all Americans:

"The U.S. government is collecting electronic records on the travel habits of millions of Americans who fly, drive or take cruises abroad, retaining data on the persons with whom they travel or plan to stay, the personal items they carry during their journeys, and even the books that travelers have carried, according to documents obtained by a group of civil liberties advocates and statements by government officials.

The personal travel records are meant to be stored for as lo…

Whatever democracy the Palestinians had is dying

Almost a desperate cry from a well-known, respected and sober moderate Palestinian.

Mustafa Barghouthi is secretary-general of the Palestinian National Initiative and a member of the Palestinian Legislative Council. He was a candidate for the Palestinian presidency in 2005.

He writes in a piece "The Slow Death of Palestinian Democracy" on FP:

"Palestinian municipal elections were supposed to be held last week. Instead, they were canceled. A statement released by the Palestinian Authority claimed the cancellation was "in order to pave the way for a successful end to the siege on Gaza and for continued efforts at unity" between Hamas, which governs the Gaza Strip, and the government in the West Bank.

The cancellation of this election was an unjustified, unlawful, and unacceptable act. It damages democratic rights and makes a mockery of the interests of the Palestinian people.

But this is far more than an internal Palestinian issue. The only lasting peace between Isr…