Skip to main content

The French presidential election......ho-hum and boring!

Like the French or not, they are going to the first of two polls on 22 April to elect a president.   In what is generally being described as a lack-lustre campaign presently underway, DNA )(Daily News & Analysis) has considers who the candidates are for possible high-office.   

"......since the beginning of the Fifth Republic in 1958, France has never witnessed such boring elections. The new Constitution of the Fifth Republic which replaced the old parliamentary system, undoubtedly brought a stability to the institutions; a majority of the electors are, however, aware that the future President will not be able to solve all the tough problems the country faces.

Sarkozy, once the hyper-president, has lost his halo. He even had to apologise for his ‘people’ (Page Three) period during the first years of his presidency and fewer electors believe that he can deliver new miracles.

Hollande has never been an exciting postulant; further he does not have the charm of his ex-companion Ségolène Royal, Sarkozy’s rival in 2007; the Socialist candidate remains ahead in all surveys and will in all probability be the next president. He has the advantage of incumbency. But this does not make the campaign thrilling.

Bayrou, the eternal looser is unable to bring enthusiasm to a campaign that is turning duller by the day; Bayrou, who wants to be the ‘alternative’ has been downgraded to the fifth place in the surveys.

Marine Le Pen, the daughter of the veteran extreme-right provocateur, Jean-Marie Le Pen is not doing as well as she expected. A few months ago, she thought that she could topple Sarkozy and reach the second round. She is now in the fourth place behind Mélenchon, the only candidate who keeps making inroads, probably thanks to his wild populist promises. But one can’t expect a modern country to return to a Bolshevik system à-la-Chinese.

The less one speaks of the other candidates, the better.
Will the last days of the race, become more ‘sexy’ or at least slightly less boring? No, no, no would say Charlotte.

The real issue is that nobody has the solutions to sort out the economic and social problems facing the country. There is no readymade panacea.

More than 75 % of the French today believe that the globalisation is something negative and that the concurrence of countries like India or China will affect further employment.

Very few believe that a solution will come from the European Union, which is ‘too bureaucratic’ and excessively centralised in its decision process.

The British press never misses an occasion to make fun of the French. The Economist calls France ‘A Country in Denial’. The cover story points out: “What is most striking about the French election is how little anybody is saying about the country’s dire economic straits. The candidates dish out at least as many promises to spend more as to spend less."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Robert Fisk's predictions for the Middle East in 2013

There is no gain-saying that Robert Fisk, fiercely independent and feisty to boot, is the veteran journalist and author covering the Middle East. Who doesn't he know or hasn't he met over the years in reporting from Beirut - where he lives?  In his latest op-ed piece for The Independent he lays out his predictions for the Middle East for 2013. Read the piece in full, here - well worthwhile - but an extract... "Never make predictions in the Middle East. My crystal ball broke long ago. But predicting the region has an honourable pedigree. “An Arab movement, newly-risen, is looming in the distance,” a French traveller to the Gulf and Baghdad wrote in 1883, “and a race hitherto downtrodden will presently claim its due place in the destinies of Islam.” A year earlier, a British diplomat in Jeddah confided that “it is within my knowledge... that the idea of freedom does at present agitate some minds even in Mecca...” So let’s say this for 2013: the “Arab Awakening” (the t

The NPT (Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty) goes on hold.....because of one non-Treaty member (Israel)

Isn't there something radically wrong here?    Israel, a non-signatory to the NPT has, evidently, been the cause for those countries that are Treaty members, notably Canada, the US and the UK, after 4 weeks of negotiation, effectively blocking off any meaningful progress in ensuring the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons.    IPS reports ..... "After nearly four weeks of negotiations, the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) Review Conference ended in a predictable outcome: a text overwhelmingly reflecting the views and interests of the nuclear-armed states and some of their nuclear-dependent allies. “The process to develop the draft Review Conference outcome document was anti-democratic and nontransparent,” Ray Acheson, director, Reaching Critical Will, Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF), told IPS. “This Review Conference has demonstrated beyond any doubt that continuing to rely on the nuclear-armed states or their nuclear-dependent allies for l

#1 Prize for a bizarre story.....and lying!

No comment called for in this piece from CommonDreams: Another young black man: The strange sad case of 21-year-old Chavis Carter. Police in Jonesboro, Arkansas  stopped  him and two friends, found some marijuana, searched put Carter, then put him handcuffed  behind his back  into their patrol car, where they say he  shot himself  in the head with a gun they failed to find. The FBI is investigating. Police Chief Michael Yates, who stands behind his officers' story,  says in an interview  that the death is "definitely bizarre and defies logic at first glance." You think?