A timely op-ed piece in The New York Times in this American election year on the so-called liberal Obama - a president worse than Bush in many respects and certainly in relation to war-mongering. One thing is for sure. Obama was in no way deserving of a Nobel Peace Prize. "The president who won the Nobel Peace Prize less than nine months after his inauguration has turned out to be one of the most militarily aggressive American leaders in decades. Liberals helped to elect Barack Obama in part because of his opposition to the Iraq war, and probably don’t celebrate all of the president’s many military accomplishments. But they are sizable. Mr. Obama decimated Al Qaeda’s leadership. He overthrew the Libyan dictator. He ramped up drone attacks in Pakistan, waged effective covert wars in Yemen and Somalia and authorized a threefold increase in the number of American troops in Afghanistan. He became the first president to authorize the assassination of a United Sta...
Old enough to know better, young enough not to care.