Morality, and plain common decency, is missing in there somewhere

Religion can be doctrinaire. It can also weave outcomes which are perverse and hard to rationalise on any level.

In a piece " Why I hate the Church I love" on Eureka Street, an example of religion being dogmatic to an extreme impossible to understand.

"Is it it any wonder the Catholic Church is seen by many, including many of its own people, as irrelevant?

How can she possibly justify the excommunication of the mother of a nine-year-old girl in Brazil for authorising the abortion of twin girls her daughter was carrying as the result of being raped by her stepfather?

Raped. Apparently since the age of six.

Sometimes I hate the Church I love.

The doctors who performed the abortion also have been excommunicated. But not the alleged perpetrator of this crime. Not the stepfather. He, says the Church, did not take an innocent life.
Oh, really? So even if the young girl was/is emotionally tortured for the rest of her life — whether or not she had the abortion — she remains 'alive' does she? And that's all that matters?

A Vatican cleric is quoted by Agence France-Presse as saying: 'It is a sad case but the real problem is that the twins conceived were two innocent persons, who had the right to live and could not be eliminated.'

Where are the innocent little girl's rights? I would say they have been eliminated.

I do not believe in wholesale abortion. I do believe in the primacy of conscience. I cannot imagine being in the same position as that mother, but if I were there is every possibility I would have done what she did. So if there is guilt by association, then, please, excommunicate me.

But know this. I will be back at Mass the following day and I will receive the Eucharist with my conscience clear.

Perhaps when there are women in the Vatican, there will be compassion. And, contrary to what our good Cardinal says, that will happen before hell freezes over."

Comments

Reading the Chilcot Inquiry Report more closely

Most commentary on the Chilcot Inquiry Report of and associated with the Iraq War, has been "lifted" from the Executive Summary. The Intercept has actually gone and dug into the Report, with these revelations : "THE CHILCOT REPORT, the U.K.’s official inquiry into its participation in the Iraq War, has finally been released after seven years of investigation. Its executive summary certainly makes former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who led the British push for war, look terrible. According to the report, Blair made statements about Iraq’s nonexistent chemical, biological, and nuclear programs based on “what Mr. Blair believed” rather than the intelligence he had been given. The U.K. went to war despite the fact that “diplomatic options had not been exhausted.” Blair was warned by British intelligence that terrorism would “increase in the event of war, reflecting intensified anti-US/anti-Western sentiment in the Muslim world, including among Muslim communities in the

Robert Fisk's predictions for the Middle East in 2013

There is no gain-saying that Robert Fisk, fiercely independent and feisty to boot, is the veteran journalist and author covering the Middle East. Who doesn't he know or hasn't he met over the years in reporting from Beirut - where he lives? In his latest op-ed piece for The Independent he lays out his predictions for the Middle East for 2013. Read the piece in full, here - well worthwhile - but an extract... "Never make predictions in the Middle East. My crystal ball broke long ago. But predicting the region has an honourable pedigree. “An Arab movement, newly-risen, is looming in the distance,” a French traveller to the Gulf and Baghdad wrote in 1883, “and a race hitherto downtrodden will presently claim its due place in the destinies of Islam.” A year earlier, a British diplomat in Jeddah confided that “it is within my knowledge... that the idea of freedom does at present agitate some minds even in Mecca...” So let’s say this for 2013: the “Arab Awakening” (the t

An unpalatable truth!

Quinoa has for the last years been the "new" food on the block for foodies. Known for its health properties, foodies the world over have taken to it. Many restaurants have added it to their menu. But, as this piece " Can vegans stomach the unpalatable truth about quinoa? " from The Guardian so clearly details, the cost to Bolivians and Peruvians - from where quinoa hails - has been substantial. "Not long ago, quinoa was just an obscure Peruvian grain you could only buy in wholefood shops. We struggled to pronounce it (it's keen-wa, not qui-no-a), yet it was feted by food lovers as a novel addition to the familiar ranks of couscous and rice. Dieticians clucked over quinoa approvingly because it ticked the low-fat box and fitted in with government healthy eating advice to "base your meals on starchy foods". Adventurous eaters liked its slightly bitter taste and the little white curls that formed around the grains. Vegans embraced quinoa as

Mahler's Prodigal Son

Search This Blog