Skip to main content

The NY Times: The free-content dimishes

The New York Times was one of the first to go on line and then some time afterward, charge an annual fee for accessing all newspaper content on line. Then the Times dropped the fee and it has, to date, basically all been free.

Now comes news that there are going to be limits to what is available gratis on line or by way of download to an iphone or ipad. It's the "world" of charging for online content that Murdoch is seeking to follow. The Times admits it is a tentative step. Of course, the $64 million question is whether reading newspapers on the likes of an ipad will save newspapers from extinction - or very substantial diminution.

"Time has decided to dive head first into an issue that has bedeviled many a news organization before it: how to wean online readers off their addictions to free content.

Time began taking content from its current issue off its Web site this week, a move that is meant to drive readers to newsstands and Time’s iPad applications.

Richard Stengel, Time’s managing editor, said the move was part of a continuing experiment to retrain readers into paying for articles.

“I think we’ll see what works and doesn’t work,” Mr. Stengel said in a telephone interview. “We’ll adapt and change. We’re in the hunt like everyone else to figure this out.”

Mr. Stengel called the decision to post abridged versions of articles on its Web site an effort to draw a brighter line between what the magazine gives away and what it charges consumers to read.

“We kind of wanted to draw a line in the sand,” he said.

Many items from the magazine will remain available on Time’s Web site. Columns like those from Joe Klein are still available, as are the magazine’s vast archives. And once an issue is two weeks old, its content will be posted on the site and available to the public.

Mr. Stengel said Time planned to adjust what it left off its site and what it decided to post to get a better feel for what works and what does not.

“We want to remain a vigorous and important part of the conversation,” he said. “There are some things that are necessary to be part of that. But we will experiment.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reading the Chilcot Inquiry Report more closely

Most commentary on the Chilcot Inquiry Report of and associated with the Iraq War, has been "lifted" from the Executive Summary.   The Intercept has actually gone and dug into the Report, with these revelations : "THE CHILCOT REPORT, the U.K.’s official inquiry into its participation in the Iraq War, has finally been released after seven years of investigation. Its executive summary certainly makes former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who led the British push for war, look terrible. According to the report, Blair made statements about Iraq’s nonexistent chemical, biological, and nuclear programs based on “what Mr. Blair believed” rather than the intelligence he had been given. The U.K. went to war despite the fact that “diplomatic options had not been exhausted.” Blair was warned by British intelligence that terrorism would “increase in the event of war, reflecting intensified anti-US/anti-Western sentiment in the Muslim world, including among Muslim communities in the

An unpalatable truth!

Quinoa has for the last years been the "new" food on the block for foodies. Known for its health properties, foodies the world over have taken to it. Many restaurants have added it to their menu. But, as this piece " Can vegans stomach the unpalatable truth about quinoa? " from The Guardian so clearly details, the cost to Bolivians and Peruvians - from where quinoa hails - has been substantial. "Not long ago, quinoa was just an obscure Peruvian grain you could only buy in wholefood shops. We struggled to pronounce it (it's keen-wa, not qui-no-a), yet it was feted by food lovers as a novel addition to the familiar ranks of couscous and rice. Dieticians clucked over quinoa approvingly because it ticked the low-fat box and fitted in with government healthy eating advice to "base your meals on starchy foods". Adventurous eaters liked its slightly bitter taste and the little white curls that formed around the grains. Vegans embraced quinoa as

Climate change: Well-organised hoax?

There are still some - all too sadly people with a voice who are listened to - who assert that climate change is a hoax. Try telling that to the people of Colorado who recently experienced horrendous bushfires, or the people of Croatia suffering with endless days of temps of 40 degrees (and not much less than 30 at night time) some 8-10 degrees above the norm. Bill McKibben, take up the issue of whether climate change is a hoax, on The Daily Beast : Please don’t sweat the 2,132 new high temperature marks in June—remember, climate change is a hoax. The first to figure this out was Oklahoma Senator James Inhofe, who in fact called it “the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people,” apparently topping even the staged moon landing. But others have been catching on. Speaker of the House John Boehner pointed out that the idea that carbon dioxide is “harmful to the environment is almost comical.” The always cautious Mitt Romney scoffed at any damage too: “Scientists will fig