Skip to main content

Shell pays off the Ogoni, but must still settle with history

Jeff Sparrow [of Overland] writing on Crikey on Shell's settlement with the Ogoni people of Africa:

“If you call off the campaign, maybe we can do something for your brother.”

That was what Brian Anderson, the then managing director of Shell, was said to have told Ken Saro-Wiwa’s relatives, shortly before the Ogoni activist was executed by the Nigerian dictatorship in November 1995.

The claims of complicity by the oil company in the deaths of Saro-Wiwa and his companions were to be tested in a New York court. Instead, Shell has offered a settlement of $US15.5 million: “a humanitarian gesture”, it says.

Now, you do not often hear “multinational oil company” and “humantarianism” in the same sentence, and in that respect the payout represents a triumph for Saro-Wiwa’s family. His son, Ken Wiwa, explained: “It will provide some kind of psychological relief to have those who they feel were responsible for the violations of human rights, being held accountable for their roles in those human rights violations.”

Of course, the settlement, which explicitly avoids any acknowledgment of guilt, means that the allegations against Shell won’t be ventilated. The lawsuit claimed that company officials provided Nigerian police with weapons, boats and other equipment, took part in their operations and even encouraged them to shoot at protestors demonstrating at pipeline constructions. None of that will be investigated.

Further, the payout goes only to the families of the executed men, not to the Ogoni people more generally. The sum involved is, in any case, a pittance, especially given the huge revenues generated by the Nigerian oil fields and the gross devastation Shell’s operations have caused."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Robert Fisk's predictions for the Middle East in 2013

There is no gain-saying that Robert Fisk, fiercely independent and feisty to boot, is the veteran journalist and author covering the Middle East. Who doesn't he know or hasn't he met over the years in reporting from Beirut - where he lives?  In his latest op-ed piece for The Independent he lays out his predictions for the Middle East for 2013. Read the piece in full, here - well worthwhile - but an extract... "Never make predictions in the Middle East. My crystal ball broke long ago. But predicting the region has an honourable pedigree. “An Arab movement, newly-risen, is looming in the distance,” a French traveller to the Gulf and Baghdad wrote in 1883, “and a race hitherto downtrodden will presently claim its due place in the destinies of Islam.” A year earlier, a British diplomat in Jeddah confided that “it is within my knowledge... that the idea of freedom does at present agitate some minds even in Mecca...” So let’s say this for 2013: the “Arab Awakening” (the t...

The NPT (Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty) goes on hold.....because of one non-Treaty member (Israel)

Isn't there something radically wrong here?    Israel, a non-signatory to the NPT has, evidently, been the cause for those countries that are Treaty members, notably Canada, the US and the UK, after 4 weeks of negotiation, effectively blocking off any meaningful progress in ensuring the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons.    IPS reports ..... "After nearly four weeks of negotiations, the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) Review Conference ended in a predictable outcome: a text overwhelmingly reflecting the views and interests of the nuclear-armed states and some of their nuclear-dependent allies. “The process to develop the draft Review Conference outcome document was anti-democratic and nontransparent,” Ray Acheson, director, Reaching Critical Will, Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF), told IPS. “This Review Conference has demonstrated beyond any doubt that continuing to rely on the nuclear-armed states or their nuclear-de...

#1 Prize for a bizarre story.....and lying!

No comment called for in this piece from CommonDreams: Another young black man: The strange sad case of 21-year-old Chavis Carter. Police in Jonesboro, Arkansas  stopped  him and two friends, found some marijuana, searched put Carter, then put him handcuffed  behind his back  into their patrol car, where they say he  shot himself  in the head with a gun they failed to find. The FBI is investigating. Police Chief Michael Yates, who stands behind his officers' story,  says in an interview  that the death is "definitely bizarre and defies logic at first glance." You think?