Skip to main content

Shell pays off the Ogoni, but must still settle with history

Jeff Sparrow [of Overland] writing on Crikey on Shell's settlement with the Ogoni people of Africa:

“If you call off the campaign, maybe we can do something for your brother.”

That was what Brian Anderson, the then managing director of Shell, was said to have told Ken Saro-Wiwa’s relatives, shortly before the Ogoni activist was executed by the Nigerian dictatorship in November 1995.

The claims of complicity by the oil company in the deaths of Saro-Wiwa and his companions were to be tested in a New York court. Instead, Shell has offered a settlement of $US15.5 million: “a humanitarian gesture”, it says.

Now, you do not often hear “multinational oil company” and “humantarianism” in the same sentence, and in that respect the payout represents a triumph for Saro-Wiwa’s family. His son, Ken Wiwa, explained: “It will provide some kind of psychological relief to have those who they feel were responsible for the violations of human rights, being held accountable for their roles in those human rights violations.”

Of course, the settlement, which explicitly avoids any acknowledgment of guilt, means that the allegations against Shell won’t be ventilated. The lawsuit claimed that company officials provided Nigerian police with weapons, boats and other equipment, took part in their operations and even encouraged them to shoot at protestors demonstrating at pipeline constructions. None of that will be investigated.

Further, the payout goes only to the families of the executed men, not to the Ogoni people more generally. The sum involved is, in any case, a pittance, especially given the huge revenues generated by the Nigerian oil fields and the gross devastation Shell’s operations have caused."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Robert Fisk's predictions for the Middle East in 2013

There is no gain-saying that Robert Fisk, fiercely independent and feisty to boot, is the veteran journalist and author covering the Middle East. Who doesn't he know or hasn't he met over the years in reporting from Beirut - where he lives?  In his latest op-ed piece for The Independent he lays out his predictions for the Middle East for 2013. Read the piece in full, here - well worthwhile - but an extract... "Never make predictions in the Middle East. My crystal ball broke long ago. But predicting the region has an honourable pedigree. “An Arab movement, newly-risen, is looming in the distance,” a French traveller to the Gulf and Baghdad wrote in 1883, “and a race hitherto downtrodden will presently claim its due place in the destinies of Islam.” A year earlier, a British diplomat in Jeddah confided that “it is within my knowledge... that the idea of freedom does at present agitate some minds even in Mecca...” So let’s say this for 2013: the “Arab Awakening” (the t

Reading the Chilcot Inquiry Report more closely

Most commentary on the Chilcot Inquiry Report of and associated with the Iraq War, has been "lifted" from the Executive Summary.   The Intercept has actually gone and dug into the Report, with these revelations : "THE CHILCOT REPORT, the U.K.’s official inquiry into its participation in the Iraq War, has finally been released after seven years of investigation. Its executive summary certainly makes former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who led the British push for war, look terrible. According to the report, Blair made statements about Iraq’s nonexistent chemical, biological, and nuclear programs based on “what Mr. Blair believed” rather than the intelligence he had been given. The U.K. went to war despite the fact that “diplomatic options had not been exhausted.” Blair was warned by British intelligence that terrorism would “increase in the event of war, reflecting intensified anti-US/anti-Western sentiment in the Muslim world, including among Muslim communities in the

An unpalatable truth!

Quinoa has for the last years been the "new" food on the block for foodies. Known for its health properties, foodies the world over have taken to it. Many restaurants have added it to their menu. But, as this piece " Can vegans stomach the unpalatable truth about quinoa? " from The Guardian so clearly details, the cost to Bolivians and Peruvians - from where quinoa hails - has been substantial. "Not long ago, quinoa was just an obscure Peruvian grain you could only buy in wholefood shops. We struggled to pronounce it (it's keen-wa, not qui-no-a), yet it was feted by food lovers as a novel addition to the familiar ranks of couscous and rice. Dieticians clucked over quinoa approvingly because it ticked the low-fat box and fitted in with government healthy eating advice to "base your meals on starchy foods". Adventurous eaters liked its slightly bitter taste and the little white curls that formed around the grains. Vegans embraced quinoa as