Skip to main content

A new type of "newspaper"?

The Guardian reports on what may well be the way of the future in how news is delivered to us:

"On May 6 last year, the day that Nicolas Sarkozy was elected president of France, news website Rue89.com launched in France, writes Stephen Brook.

"One year on we are in better shape than he was," founder Pierre Haski told the World Editors Forum at WAN. The site came into its own just a week after launch, when it found out that a newspaper had suppressed a story that Sarkozy's wife Cecilia did not vote in the secondround election because its owner was a friend of the president. "This was worth all the most expensive advertising campaign for our launch, our servers were blown up," Haski said.

With a team of about 15 journalists, the free, advertiser-supported website, born out of the sickly state of print journalism in France has about 650,000 unique users after a year.

Several months after launch, Rue89.com canceled its contract a wire service and stopped reprinting wire stories. "We never put one single wire story online, never. We are not running after hot news. We realised after three months no-one was looking at it. They are flooded by easily available news," Haski said.

The site does not use citizen journalism, rather a hybrid "pro-am" model - professionals and amateurs working together. The motto is "information with three voices, journalists, experts and readers, working together in the news-gathering process," Haski said. One third of the content comes from non-professional sources, in the form of alerts, testimony and commentaries, but professional journalists have the final say on what goes online.

The site has active blogs and opted for a free registration system to cut down on offensive comments - it stopped 90% of them. In an unusual innovation, for very active blogs editors select the best comments and put them up the top of the comments section to give readers the best selection. Journalists and authors moderate their own blogs."

Meanwhile, the IHT reports on another aspect and dimension on the life of newspapers:

"As readership and revenues shift onto the Internet, top news media executives must seek new digital opportunities without neglecting their traditional print publications by rushing headlong into cyberspace, media experts said in a report released Tuesday.

The second annual World Digital Media Trends report, issued at a meeting of the World Association of Newspapers, said the digital platforms of newspapers were growing at a double-digit rate worldwide.

One study showed that the Internet in some countries would "become the primary news and information source within five years, while newspapers will lose the dominating position they have held for more than a century."

Newspapers cannot count on their print editions alone to keep them solvent, the report said. However, the association's president, Gavin O'Reilly, warned that newspapers should not rush unprepared into new mobile and Internet markets, in part because about 60 percent of the new revenue goes to two companies, the search engine giants Google and Yahoo."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reading the Chilcot Inquiry Report more closely

Most commentary on the Chilcot Inquiry Report of and associated with the Iraq War, has been "lifted" from the Executive Summary.   The Intercept has actually gone and dug into the Report, with these revelations : "THE CHILCOT REPORT, the U.K.’s official inquiry into its participation in the Iraq War, has finally been released after seven years of investigation. Its executive summary certainly makes former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who led the British push for war, look terrible. According to the report, Blair made statements about Iraq’s nonexistent chemical, biological, and nuclear programs based on “what Mr. Blair believed” rather than the intelligence he had been given. The U.K. went to war despite the fact that “diplomatic options had not been exhausted.” Blair was warned by British intelligence that terrorism would “increase in the event of war, reflecting intensified anti-US/anti-Western sentiment in the Muslim world, including among Muslim communities in the

An unpalatable truth!

Quinoa has for the last years been the "new" food on the block for foodies. Known for its health properties, foodies the world over have taken to it. Many restaurants have added it to their menu. But, as this piece " Can vegans stomach the unpalatable truth about quinoa? " from The Guardian so clearly details, the cost to Bolivians and Peruvians - from where quinoa hails - has been substantial. "Not long ago, quinoa was just an obscure Peruvian grain you could only buy in wholefood shops. We struggled to pronounce it (it's keen-wa, not qui-no-a), yet it was feted by food lovers as a novel addition to the familiar ranks of couscous and rice. Dieticians clucked over quinoa approvingly because it ticked the low-fat box and fitted in with government healthy eating advice to "base your meals on starchy foods". Adventurous eaters liked its slightly bitter taste and the little white curls that formed around the grains. Vegans embraced quinoa as

Climate change: Well-organised hoax?

There are still some - all too sadly people with a voice who are listened to - who assert that climate change is a hoax. Try telling that to the people of Colorado who recently experienced horrendous bushfires, or the people of Croatia suffering with endless days of temps of 40 degrees (and not much less than 30 at night time) some 8-10 degrees above the norm. Bill McKibben, take up the issue of whether climate change is a hoax, on The Daily Beast : Please don’t sweat the 2,132 new high temperature marks in June—remember, climate change is a hoax. The first to figure this out was Oklahoma Senator James Inhofe, who in fact called it “the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people,” apparently topping even the staged moon landing. But others have been catching on. Speaker of the House John Boehner pointed out that the idea that carbon dioxide is “harmful to the environment is almost comical.” The always cautious Mitt Romney scoffed at any damage too: “Scientists will fig