Skip to main content

Working in 40 degree celsius temperatures.... making Armani jeans

Aah, to look cool and be seen to be wearing a brand-name.  Armani!    But for the workers making those jeans it's a different story altogether.    Like fainting from working in 40 degree celsius temperatures.  France 24 reports.....

"Imagine working in temperatures of 40 degrees Celsius, all day long. That’s what workers at a Cambodian factory say they are forced to endure as they make Armani jeans, leading to frequent fainting. They're furious that the factory’s owners never installed a promised cooling system.

Kin Tai factory, which is owned by a Taiwan-based company, is located in Phnom Penh. It focuses on making pants, for a variety of international clients – including, in the past, for US police officers and firefighters. It has repeatedly come under fire for violations of Cambodian labour laws, including denying maternity leave benefits and seniority bonuses, and giving employees only short-term contracts, even when they had worked there for years.

When it comes to heat, Kin Tai factory is a repeat offender. In 2010, local authorities demanded that the factory install sprinklers on its roof to cool the building. This never happened, according to an April 2014 investigation by the Worker Rights Consortium, commissioned by the city of Phnom Penh. Investigators recorded temperatures of 38 degrees Celsius inside the factory, and gathered testimony from workers who said temperatures regularly reached 40 degrees. Once again, factory officials promised to install a cooling system.

Now, more than a year later, union representatives say nothing has changed, and that if anything, the heat is worse. Workers have recently started sharing photos of fainting colleagues to try to bring attention to the problem."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Pentagon's eye-popping spending....and waste!

Only a gigantic bureaucracy could get away with spending of such dimensions - and the amazing waste involved in part of that ginormous spend.   Think US Pentagon..... "From spending $150 million on private villas for a handful of personnel in Afghanistan to blowing $2.7 billion on an air surveillance balloon that doesn’t work, the latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.  Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars' worth of weapons components that will never be used. And then there’s the one that would have to be everyone’s favorite Pentagon waste story: the spending of $50,000 to investigate the bomb-detecting capabilities of African elephants. (And here’s a shock: they didn’t turn out to be that great!) The elephant research, of course, represe...

Video: Israel demolishing a Bedouin village

From Mondoweiss - Israel's supposed "most moral army in the world", the IDF, engaged in immoral, and according to international law, illegal action.... "Israeli forces have demolished every home in the Bedouin village of Khirbet Taha in the northern West Bank district of Nablus during three separate demolitions since the start of the year. Unlike most Bedouin villages, the residents in Khirbet Taha own their own land. However that land falls in Area C, territory in the occupied West Bank under full Israeli control. The village’s only school was also destroyed, leaving children to study in a dilapidated 100-year-old mosque — the only structure left standing in the village. According the United Nations, Israel has demolished half as many Palestinian buildings in the first few months of 2016, as they had in all of 2015. In February alone, the UN found that more Palestinians homes were destroyed than any other month since 2009, when the organization began its docum...

What does a no-fly zone actually mean?

As some countries consider imposing a no-fly zone in relation to Libya, the pertinent question must be what does that mean and entail? FP provides the answers: "It depends on the circumstances. There are two primary types of no-fly zones imposed by air forces. The first is imposed by one military over another, while the two sides are at war. In practice, this type of no-fly zone amounts to a warning from one side that it will engage the other's aircraft if they are spotted in a given territory. The second type, more applicable to the situation in Libya, is when an outside power possessing overwhelming air superiority restricts flights over a given country in order to discourage an internal conflict or humanitarian crisis. This is a relatively recent tactic, which was used most famously in Bosnia and Iraq during the 1990s. No-fly zones are often a compromise in situations where the international community is demanding a response to ongoing violence, but full military interven...