Skip to main content

Australia's shame

There can be little that isn't shameful about how Australia's indigenous population has been treated since the arrival of the white man - and the appalling position they still find themselves in 2011.

An all-party Federal Parliamentary Committee released a Report on the plight of the aboriginal community last week - as op-ed columnist Mike Carlton deals takes up in his latest column in the Sydney Morning Herald.

"Last Monday night, a report with the rather clunky title of Doing Time - Time for Doing: Indigenous Youth in the Criminal Justice System was tabled in Federal Parliament.

Its contents were anything but clunky. They were horrifying. Aboriginal Australians are being thrown into prison at a greater rate than ever before, in every state and territory. Between 2000 and 2010, the number of black males in custody increased by 55 per cent, and the number of black females by 47 per cent.

Far too many of them were and are kids. The report found that: "The detention rate for indigenous juveniles is 397 per 100,000, which is 28 times higher than the rate for non-indigenous juveniles (14 per 100,000). In 2007, indigenous juveniles accounted for 59 per cent of the total juvenile detention population."

And it gets worse. To quote again:

Aboriginal Australians make up about 2.5 per cent of the national population, but 25 per cent of the prison population.

Indigenous juveniles make up 53 per cent of all juveniles in detention.

Twenty-two per cent of indigenous juveniles in detention were 14 or younger, compared with 14 per cent of non-indigenous juveniles.

NSW has the highest total number of indigenous people in prison: 2139.

Western Australia has the highest number per capita: at least three indigenous people in jail for every 100 state residents.

In case you're wondering, this report was not the work of a bunch of bleeding-heart lefties. It was compiled by an all-party committee of MPs - Labor, Liberal, the lot - who agreed unanimously that "this situation is a national disgrace" and that "all governments, including the Commonwealth, states and territories, have failed to adequately address this problem".

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Pentagon's eye-popping spending....and waste!

Only a gigantic bureaucracy could get away with spending of such dimensions - and the amazing waste involved in part of that ginormous spend.   Think US Pentagon..... "From spending $150 million on private villas for a handful of personnel in Afghanistan to blowing $2.7 billion on an air surveillance balloon that doesn’t work, the latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.  Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars' worth of weapons components that will never be used. And then there’s the one that would have to be everyone’s favorite Pentagon waste story: the spending of $50,000 to investigate the bomb-detecting capabilities of African elephants. (And here’s a shock: they didn’t turn out to be that great!) The elephant research, of course, represe...

Video: Israel demolishing a Bedouin village

From Mondoweiss - Israel's supposed "most moral army in the world", the IDF, engaged in immoral, and according to international law, illegal action.... "Israeli forces have demolished every home in the Bedouin village of Khirbet Taha in the northern West Bank district of Nablus during three separate demolitions since the start of the year. Unlike most Bedouin villages, the residents in Khirbet Taha own their own land. However that land falls in Area C, territory in the occupied West Bank under full Israeli control. The village’s only school was also destroyed, leaving children to study in a dilapidated 100-year-old mosque — the only structure left standing in the village. According the United Nations, Israel has demolished half as many Palestinian buildings in the first few months of 2016, as they had in all of 2015. In February alone, the UN found that more Palestinians homes were destroyed than any other month since 2009, when the organization began its docum...

What does a no-fly zone actually mean?

As some countries consider imposing a no-fly zone in relation to Libya, the pertinent question must be what does that mean and entail? FP provides the answers: "It depends on the circumstances. There are two primary types of no-fly zones imposed by air forces. The first is imposed by one military over another, while the two sides are at war. In practice, this type of no-fly zone amounts to a warning from one side that it will engage the other's aircraft if they are spotted in a given territory. The second type, more applicable to the situation in Libya, is when an outside power possessing overwhelming air superiority restricts flights over a given country in order to discourage an internal conflict or humanitarian crisis. This is a relatively recent tactic, which was used most famously in Bosnia and Iraq during the 1990s. No-fly zones are often a compromise in situations where the international community is demanding a response to ongoing violence, but full military interven...