Skip to main content

Haunted by details missing in the struggle for objectivity

We are all familiar with that now iconic photograph of a lone man standing in front of tanks in Tiananmen Square. No one even knows what became of the man, although it is assumed he was one of the many killed on that now infamous day on 4 June, 1989 - 20 years ago.

There has much analysis of the event on the anniversary of that black day.

Peter Ellingsen was China correspondent for The Age from 1988 to 1991. He writes in The Age of his personal recollection and reflections of the day and his "place" in the Sqaure that day:

"I have a favourite photograph of Tiananmen Square. It is a horizontal shot. A man rides a bicycle in the foreground - behind him there are serried rows of upright figures, thousands and thousands of figures.

The photograph was taken in May 1989. The figures are students celebrating their occupancy of the famous square. But in the photograph they seem like odd dots against the vastness of the blue sky.

It was two weeks before the tanks rolled in, a time when it was still possible to imagine the tall light poles lining the square as palm trees. Apart from the ominous bulk of Mao's tomb, the scene has a balmy feel; it could be a giant street market.

I look at this picture, rather than the others I have - all burnt-out buses and charred bodies - to remind me of the hugeness of China and the impossibility of my accounting for it.

Tiananmen Square became an urban killing field, one that I witnessed without knowing what I was seeing, or how to see it. Fifteen years of reporting certainly did not prepare me for that night 20 years ago when China's ageing governing despots unleashed a modern army on the capital.

I watched as soldiers fired randomly into houses and at darkened street corners where people stood dazed with shock and disbelief. I peered into blackness, first glimpsing flashes of gunfire, before hearing a delayed crack, like a whip, and the deep-grinding rumble of armoured personnel carriers.

People slumped onto the footpaths outside their homes; others were ground into the bitumen beneath the tanks. I told myself not to look away, but what I saw was not enough - or too much. It overwhelmed and invaded me."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Pentagon's eye-popping spending....and waste!

Only a gigantic bureaucracy could get away with spending of such dimensions - and the amazing waste involved in part of that ginormous spend.   Think US Pentagon..... "From spending $150 million on private villas for a handful of personnel in Afghanistan to blowing $2.7 billion on an air surveillance balloon that doesn’t work, the latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.  Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars' worth of weapons components that will never be used. And then there’s the one that would have to be everyone’s favorite Pentagon waste story: the spending of $50,000 to investigate the bomb-detecting capabilities of African elephants. (And here’s a shock: they didn’t turn out to be that great!) The elephant research, of course, represe...

Video: Israel demolishing a Bedouin village

From Mondoweiss - Israel's supposed "most moral army in the world", the IDF, engaged in immoral, and according to international law, illegal action.... "Israeli forces have demolished every home in the Bedouin village of Khirbet Taha in the northern West Bank district of Nablus during three separate demolitions since the start of the year. Unlike most Bedouin villages, the residents in Khirbet Taha own their own land. However that land falls in Area C, territory in the occupied West Bank under full Israeli control. The village’s only school was also destroyed, leaving children to study in a dilapidated 100-year-old mosque — the only structure left standing in the village. According the United Nations, Israel has demolished half as many Palestinian buildings in the first few months of 2016, as they had in all of 2015. In February alone, the UN found that more Palestinians homes were destroyed than any other month since 2009, when the organization began its docum...

What does a no-fly zone actually mean?

As some countries consider imposing a no-fly zone in relation to Libya, the pertinent question must be what does that mean and entail? FP provides the answers: "It depends on the circumstances. There are two primary types of no-fly zones imposed by air forces. The first is imposed by one military over another, while the two sides are at war. In practice, this type of no-fly zone amounts to a warning from one side that it will engage the other's aircraft if they are spotted in a given territory. The second type, more applicable to the situation in Libya, is when an outside power possessing overwhelming air superiority restricts flights over a given country in order to discourage an internal conflict or humanitarian crisis. This is a relatively recent tactic, which was used most famously in Bosnia and Iraq during the 1990s. No-fly zones are often a compromise in situations where the international community is demanding a response to ongoing violence, but full military interven...