Skip to main content

Are You Living in a Liveable City?

It's an annual survey. Which cities on this planet of ours are the most liveable? Of course, the result is dependant on all sorts of factors - and who the persons polled were. But, in the end all cities vie for recognition as the most liveable city in the world.

The result for 2009 are in - as AHN reports, here:

"Vancouver, the capital city of British Columbia, topped the list of the Economist Intelligence Unit's global liveability survey covering 140 cities around the world. Vancouver registered a 98 percent score out of a perfect 100 standard.

It was followed by Vienna in Austria and Melbourne in Australia. A second Canadian city, Toronto - the capital of Ontario - ranked fourth. It went up from a sixth place finish last year. It was followed by Perth in Australia and Calgary in Canada. The other top-ranked cities are Helsinki in Finland, Sydney in Australia and Zurich and Geneva in Switzerland.

The ranking is based on an assessment of living conditions by rating relative comfort using 30 qualitative and quantitative parameters from five broad categories. The categories are: stability, healthcare, culture and environment, education, and infrastructure.

On the opposite end is the capital city of Zimbabwe, Harare, which has been suffering from mega-inflation rates the past years. Majority of the cellar dwellers are Asian and African cities. Manila, the capital city of the Philippines, placed 108th, New Delhi in India was at 114th ranking and Nairobi in Kenya landed on the 122nd spot.

On the average, the global mean was 76.1 percent. Cities in Western Europe had the highest average at 92.2 percent, followed North American cities with 91.5 percent. Sub-Saharan African cities got a 51 percent average.

The EIU, which publishes The Economist, said it was not surprised by the results of the survey, particularly the high scores of Western European and North American cities "given the implied stability and mature infrastructures offered by the two regions."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Pentagon's eye-popping spending....and waste!

Only a gigantic bureaucracy could get away with spending of such dimensions - and the amazing waste involved in part of that ginormous spend.   Think US Pentagon..... "From spending $150 million on private villas for a handful of personnel in Afghanistan to blowing $2.7 billion on an air surveillance balloon that doesn’t work, the latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.  Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars' worth of weapons components that will never be used. And then there’s the one that would have to be everyone’s favorite Pentagon waste story: the spending of $50,000 to investigate the bomb-detecting capabilities of African elephants. (And here’s a shock: they didn’t turn out to be that great!) The elephant research, of course, represe...

Video: Israel demolishing a Bedouin village

From Mondoweiss - Israel's supposed "most moral army in the world", the IDF, engaged in immoral, and according to international law, illegal action.... "Israeli forces have demolished every home in the Bedouin village of Khirbet Taha in the northern West Bank district of Nablus during three separate demolitions since the start of the year. Unlike most Bedouin villages, the residents in Khirbet Taha own their own land. However that land falls in Area C, territory in the occupied West Bank under full Israeli control. The village’s only school was also destroyed, leaving children to study in a dilapidated 100-year-old mosque — the only structure left standing in the village. According the United Nations, Israel has demolished half as many Palestinian buildings in the first few months of 2016, as they had in all of 2015. In February alone, the UN found that more Palestinians homes were destroyed than any other month since 2009, when the organization began its docum...

What does a no-fly zone actually mean?

As some countries consider imposing a no-fly zone in relation to Libya, the pertinent question must be what does that mean and entail? FP provides the answers: "It depends on the circumstances. There are two primary types of no-fly zones imposed by air forces. The first is imposed by one military over another, while the two sides are at war. In practice, this type of no-fly zone amounts to a warning from one side that it will engage the other's aircraft if they are spotted in a given territory. The second type, more applicable to the situation in Libya, is when an outside power possessing overwhelming air superiority restricts flights over a given country in order to discourage an internal conflict or humanitarian crisis. This is a relatively recent tactic, which was used most famously in Bosnia and Iraq during the 1990s. No-fly zones are often a compromise in situations where the international community is demanding a response to ongoing violence, but full military interven...