Skip to main content

Soaring to busting level

The Age reports on some staggering data on the obesity of Australians - now and going forward:

"Obesity is the new tobacco and poses a major threat to Australia's economic future, a group of internationally renowned health experts warns the Prime Minister.

In an open letter to Kevin Rudd, the specialists call for the obesity epidemic to be top of the 2020 Summit agenda, claiming the nation has put on 2.4 million kilograms since federal Labor came to power.

The four acclaimed professors say obesity should be treated as a "national emergency" and given the same health priority status as smoking, HIV and immunisations.

Paul Zimmet, director of the International Diabetes Institute, Mark Nelson, chair of general practice at the University of Tasmania, nutrition expert Ian Caterson and metabolic health specialist Stephen Colagiuri, both from Sydney University, say the epidemic already costs $21 billion a year and the problem is growing.

"In the 120 days since the Government took office, Australians have gained a staggering 2.4 million kilos between them. Along with this weight has come disease and disability, as well as personal and societal trauma," the experts write. "By 2020 we will have amassed an additional 100 million kilos of unwanted blubber and the obesity epidemic will be biting deeply into every aspect of national life."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Pentagon's eye-popping spending....and waste!

Only a gigantic bureaucracy could get away with spending of such dimensions - and the amazing waste involved in part of that ginormous spend.   Think US Pentagon..... "From spending $150 million on private villas for a handful of personnel in Afghanistan to blowing $2.7 billion on an air surveillance balloon that doesn’t work, the latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.  Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars' worth of weapons components that will never be used. And then there’s the one that would have to be everyone’s favorite Pentagon waste story: the spending of $50,000 to investigate the bomb-detecting capabilities of African elephants. (And here’s a shock: they didn’t turn out to be that great!) The elephant research, of course, represe...

Video: Israel demolishing a Bedouin village

From Mondoweiss - Israel's supposed "most moral army in the world", the IDF, engaged in immoral, and according to international law, illegal action.... "Israeli forces have demolished every home in the Bedouin village of Khirbet Taha in the northern West Bank district of Nablus during three separate demolitions since the start of the year. Unlike most Bedouin villages, the residents in Khirbet Taha own their own land. However that land falls in Area C, territory in the occupied West Bank under full Israeli control. The village’s only school was also destroyed, leaving children to study in a dilapidated 100-year-old mosque — the only structure left standing in the village. According the United Nations, Israel has demolished half as many Palestinian buildings in the first few months of 2016, as they had in all of 2015. In February alone, the UN found that more Palestinians homes were destroyed than any other month since 2009, when the organization began its docum...

What does a no-fly zone actually mean?

As some countries consider imposing a no-fly zone in relation to Libya, the pertinent question must be what does that mean and entail? FP provides the answers: "It depends on the circumstances. There are two primary types of no-fly zones imposed by air forces. The first is imposed by one military over another, while the two sides are at war. In practice, this type of no-fly zone amounts to a warning from one side that it will engage the other's aircraft if they are spotted in a given territory. The second type, more applicable to the situation in Libya, is when an outside power possessing overwhelming air superiority restricts flights over a given country in order to discourage an internal conflict or humanitarian crisis. This is a relatively recent tactic, which was used most famously in Bosnia and Iraq during the 1990s. No-fly zones are often a compromise in situations where the international community is demanding a response to ongoing violence, but full military interven...