Skip to main content

The "debacle" which cannot be ignored

Once again the mainstream media has been shown severely lacking in reporting on a major Report on the Iraq War.

The Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS) is a policy research and strategic gaming organization within NDU serving the Depart- ment of Defense, its components, and interagency partners. Established in 1984, the institute provides senior decisionmakers with timely, objective analysis and gaming events and supports NDU educational programs in the areas of international security affairs and defense strategy and policy. Through an active outreach pro- gram, including conferences and publications, INSS seeks to promote understanding of emerging strategic challenges and policy options.

Coming from the Pentagon's premier educational institution the Institute's latest Report "Choosing War: The Decision to Invade Iraq and Its Aftermath" [go here to read the full Report] should not be ignored - especially as it concludes that the Iraq War has been a "debacle".

heraldsun.com.au is one of the few media outlets which has reported on the Report:

"The war in Iraq has become "a major debacle" and the outcome "is in doubt", despite improvements in security, according to a highly critical study published by the Pentagon's premier military educational institute.

The report, released by the National Institute for Strategic Studies, raises fresh doubts about President George W. Bush's projections of a US victory in Iraq just a week after he announced he was suspending US troop reductions.

The report carries considerable weight because it was written by Joseph Collins, a former senior Pentagon official, and drew on interviews with other former senior defence and intelligence officials involved in pre-war preparations.

"Measured in blood and treasure, the war in Iraq has achieved the status of a major war and a major debacle," says the report's opening line.

"Despite impressive progress in security, the outcome of the war is in doubt," the report says.

"For many analysts (including this one), Iraq remains a 'must win', but for many others, despite obvious progress under General David Petraeus and the surge, it now looks like a 'can't win'."

The report lays much of the blame on then-defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld."

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Pentagon's eye-popping spending....and waste!

Only a gigantic bureaucracy could get away with spending of such dimensions - and the amazing waste involved in part of that ginormous spend.   Think US Pentagon..... "From spending $150 million on private villas for a handful of personnel in Afghanistan to blowing $2.7 billion on an air surveillance balloon that doesn’t work, the latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.  Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars' worth of weapons components that will never be used. And then there’s the one that would have to be everyone’s favorite Pentagon waste story: the spending of $50,000 to investigate the bomb-detecting capabilities of African elephants. (And here’s a shock: they didn’t turn out to be that great!) The elephant research, of course, represe...
Post a Comment
Read more

Video: Israel demolishing a Bedouin village

From Mondoweiss - Israel's supposed "most moral army in the world", the IDF, engaged in immoral, and according to international law, illegal action.... "Israeli forces have demolished every home in the Bedouin village of Khirbet Taha in the northern West Bank district of Nablus during three separate demolitions since the start of the year. Unlike most Bedouin villages, the residents in Khirbet Taha own their own land. However that land falls in Area C, territory in the occupied West Bank under full Israeli control. The village’s only school was also destroyed, leaving children to study in a dilapidated 100-year-old mosque — the only structure left standing in the village. According the United Nations, Israel has demolished half as many Palestinian buildings in the first few months of 2016, as they had in all of 2015. In February alone, the UN found that more Palestinians homes were destroyed than any other month since 2009, when the organization began its docum...
Post a Comment
Read more

What does a no-fly zone actually mean?

As some countries consider imposing a no-fly zone in relation to Libya, the pertinent question must be what does that mean and entail? FP provides the answers: "It depends on the circumstances. There are two primary types of no-fly zones imposed by air forces. The first is imposed by one military over another, while the two sides are at war. In practice, this type of no-fly zone amounts to a warning from one side that it will engage the other's aircraft if they are spotted in a given territory. The second type, more applicable to the situation in Libya, is when an outside power possessing overwhelming air superiority restricts flights over a given country in order to discourage an internal conflict or humanitarian crisis. This is a relatively recent tactic, which was used most famously in Bosnia and Iraq during the 1990s. No-fly zones are often a compromise in situations where the international community is demanding a response to ongoing violence, but full military interven...
6 comments
Read more