Skip to main content

Who would want those sort of "friends?"

Ex-PM Howard - thrown out of office, including losing his own seat - has since the election last November been silent.

Breaking convention - a Howard trait - he spoke in Washington at gala [should that be galah?] dinner last week and attacked the Rudd Government. No doubt his "friends" at the dinner lapped it all up.

Mike Carleton, writing in the SMH, has his own observations on Howard and the dinner itself:

"At a gala black-tie dinner in Washington DC on Wednesday, in an act of near perfect symmetry, The Hermit of Wollstonecraft graciously accepted the 2008 Irving Kristol Award, a high honour bestowed by that bastion of liberty, the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.

For readers unsure of what all this means, a quick glossary:

The Hermit, formerly known as John Howard, was once an Australian prime minister. Irving Kristol, a name that by rights ought to belong to a B-grade Hollywood bandleader, is a strident propagandist acknowledged as the godfather of American neo-conservatism.

The American Enterprise Institute is a so-called think tank of hard right armchair warriors and Republican Party logrollers who have been wrong on just about every matter of global importance since the Tet Offensive of 1968.

Hence the symmetry. How fitting that the AEI should clutch The Hermit to its collective bosom.

Its "scholars" and "fellows", as they pompously style themselves, include Paul Wolfowitz, a former deputy secretary of defence, co-architect of George Bush's Iraq War and disgraced World Bank boss; John Bolton, a loopy US ambassador to the United Nations eventually skewered by Congress; and Richard Perle, aka the Prince of Darkness, another Washington Beltway carpetbagger who now spends much of his time attempting to disentangle himself from the business affairs of the recently jailed Canadian publisher, the criminal Conrad Black.

Disgracefully ignoring the convention that political figures do not bag Australia or its government abroad, Howard delivered a turgid, self-lubricating dump on Kevin Rudd's withdrawal from Iraq and the axing of Work Choices.

No one from the current Bush Administration turned up for the Man of Steel's last hurrah. Sic transit gloria."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Pentagon's eye-popping spending....and waste!

Only a gigantic bureaucracy could get away with spending of such dimensions - and the amazing waste involved in part of that ginormous spend.   Think US Pentagon..... "From spending $150 million on private villas for a handful of personnel in Afghanistan to blowing $2.7 billion on an air surveillance balloon that doesn’t work, the latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.  Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars' worth of weapons components that will never be used. And then there’s the one that would have to be everyone’s favorite Pentagon waste story: the spending of $50,000 to investigate the bomb-detecting capabilities of African elephants. (And here’s a shock: they didn’t turn out to be that great!) The elephant research, of course, represe...

Video: Israel demolishing a Bedouin village

From Mondoweiss - Israel's supposed "most moral army in the world", the IDF, engaged in immoral, and according to international law, illegal action.... "Israeli forces have demolished every home in the Bedouin village of Khirbet Taha in the northern West Bank district of Nablus during three separate demolitions since the start of the year. Unlike most Bedouin villages, the residents in Khirbet Taha own their own land. However that land falls in Area C, territory in the occupied West Bank under full Israeli control. The village’s only school was also destroyed, leaving children to study in a dilapidated 100-year-old mosque — the only structure left standing in the village. According the United Nations, Israel has demolished half as many Palestinian buildings in the first few months of 2016, as they had in all of 2015. In February alone, the UN found that more Palestinians homes were destroyed than any other month since 2009, when the organization began its docum...

What does a no-fly zone actually mean?

As some countries consider imposing a no-fly zone in relation to Libya, the pertinent question must be what does that mean and entail? FP provides the answers: "It depends on the circumstances. There are two primary types of no-fly zones imposed by air forces. The first is imposed by one military over another, while the two sides are at war. In practice, this type of no-fly zone amounts to a warning from one side that it will engage the other's aircraft if they are spotted in a given territory. The second type, more applicable to the situation in Libya, is when an outside power possessing overwhelming air superiority restricts flights over a given country in order to discourage an internal conflict or humanitarian crisis. This is a relatively recent tactic, which was used most famously in Bosnia and Iraq during the 1990s. No-fly zones are often a compromise in situations where the international community is demanding a response to ongoing violence, but full military interven...