Skip to main content

From Lucky to Mean Country.....

"I have always regarded my country as a generous nation, but what do the data tell us? We rank very well (third) when it comes to overall wealth, life expectancy and education. But when it comes to reducing poverty, we are a lowly 14th out of 18 OECD countries on the UN Human Poverty Index.

In the decade to 2004, poverty in Australia increased significantly, no matter how you measure it, and Australia is fourth from the bottom on the social housing league table.

Even though the Federal Government has doubled the overseas aid budget, we are still 19th out of 22 OECD countries.

The situation at home is equally deplorable. The latest OECD Education at a Glance report shows declining levels of investment in public education, and the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare's data shows the Government's declining levels of investment in our hospitals. And then both public systems get clobbered by our leaders for underperforming.

Have a good look at the countries that have the lowest poverty scores, countries that spread their wealth, such as Sweden, Norway, the Netherlands, Finland and Canada. Then have a look at the recent UNICEF report entitled An overview of child wellbeing in 21 OECD rich countries. It reviewed 40 indicators of child wellbeing that in one way or another reflect the way we treat our young people."

In the midst of an election campaign underway with dollars by the fistful being thrown at electors, Rob Moodie, professor of global health at the University of Melbourne's Nossal Institute, questions what has happened to Australia as a caring nation.

Read the professor's piece, in full, from The Age, here.

Coincidentally, ACOSS has just released a report "Australia Fair" which sheds light on the real position of Australians:

"New figures released by Australia Fair show that the number of Australians in poverty increased from 9.8% to 11.1% of the population between 2003-04 and 2005-06. This is based on the standard measure used extensively in OECD countries, 50% of median income."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Pentagon's eye-popping spending....and waste!

Only a gigantic bureaucracy could get away with spending of such dimensions - and the amazing waste involved in part of that ginormous spend.   Think US Pentagon..... "From spending $150 million on private villas for a handful of personnel in Afghanistan to blowing $2.7 billion on an air surveillance balloon that doesn’t work, the latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.  Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars' worth of weapons components that will never be used. And then there’s the one that would have to be everyone’s favorite Pentagon waste story: the spending of $50,000 to investigate the bomb-detecting capabilities of African elephants. (And here’s a shock: they didn’t turn out to be that great!) The elephant research, of course, represe...

Video: Israel demolishing a Bedouin village

From Mondoweiss - Israel's supposed "most moral army in the world", the IDF, engaged in immoral, and according to international law, illegal action.... "Israeli forces have demolished every home in the Bedouin village of Khirbet Taha in the northern West Bank district of Nablus during three separate demolitions since the start of the year. Unlike most Bedouin villages, the residents in Khirbet Taha own their own land. However that land falls in Area C, territory in the occupied West Bank under full Israeli control. The village’s only school was also destroyed, leaving children to study in a dilapidated 100-year-old mosque — the only structure left standing in the village. According the United Nations, Israel has demolished half as many Palestinian buildings in the first few months of 2016, as they had in all of 2015. In February alone, the UN found that more Palestinians homes were destroyed than any other month since 2009, when the organization began its docum...

What does a no-fly zone actually mean?

As some countries consider imposing a no-fly zone in relation to Libya, the pertinent question must be what does that mean and entail? FP provides the answers: "It depends on the circumstances. There are two primary types of no-fly zones imposed by air forces. The first is imposed by one military over another, while the two sides are at war. In practice, this type of no-fly zone amounts to a warning from one side that it will engage the other's aircraft if they are spotted in a given territory. The second type, more applicable to the situation in Libya, is when an outside power possessing overwhelming air superiority restricts flights over a given country in order to discourage an internal conflict or humanitarian crisis. This is a relatively recent tactic, which was used most famously in Bosnia and Iraq during the 1990s. No-fly zones are often a compromise in situations where the international community is demanding a response to ongoing violence, but full military interven...