Skip to main content

The New York TImes gives airspace to the $27 million man bragging about income inequality

FAIR more than rightly queries what the New York Times was doing, in effect, giving some sort of endorsement - or at the very least, some airspace - to a CEO earning $27 million a year extolling his corporation for giving a raise to his company's employees......which actually creates income inequality.

"They must have been high-fiving themselves at JPMorgan Chase’s PR offices this morning.

Chase’s CEO, Jamie Dimon, was given prime space on the New York Times‘ op-ed page today (7/12/16) to declare that his bank was doing something about “wage stagnation” and “income inequality” by “giving thousands of employees a raise”:


Our minimum salary for American employees today is $10.15 an hour…almost $3 above the current national minimum wage. Over the next three years, we will raise the minimum pay for 18,000 employees to between $12 and $16.50 an hour for full-time, part-time and new employees, depending on geographic and market factors.


“A pay increase is the right thing to do,” declares Dimon.


How nice of the Times to give one of our corporate overlords a chance to let us know he’s doing the right thing!


Chase is the largest bank in the United States, and in 2015 it made $23.9 billion in after-tax income.  You may have gotten the (intended) impression from Dimon’s op-ed that Chase has 18,000 employees; in fact, it has 241,000. That means for each one of its employees, the company is making $99,000 in profit. By comparison, the prospect of a $1.85-an-hour raise for 7 percent of them over three years is rather small potatoes.


Dimon himself made $27 million in compensation in 2015. Right now, the lowest-paid full-time Chase employee makes 0.08 percent as much as the CEO; for those who get the pay raise, after it goes through, it’ll be 0.09 percent—assuming that Dimon doesn’t get a pay raise of his own in the next three years. So not much of a blow against income inequality—a problem that is in large part driven by the financial industry’s soaring profits.


That these meager advances were seen as significant news that deserved trumpeting on the New York Times op-ed page is reason enough for the Chase PR team to break out the champagne. But the real reason this is such a win for them is that these wage increases are largely involuntary.


Consider: In New York City, where Chase is based and more than 10 percent of its employees work, the minimum wage will be not $12 but $15 in 2019, and the rest of the state will soon follow. California, the state with almost a fifth of Chase branches, will have a $12 minimum wage in 2019, increasing to $15 by 2022. Many other states have already increased their minimum wages or are considering following suit; if the federal minimum wage is not increased by 2019, that would be the longest interval without an increase since a national wage floor was introduced in 1938.


So the raises Dimon is bragging about doling out will be legally mandated—if not everywhere in the US, at least in large areas where Chase operates. And thus one of the prime beneficiaries of income inequality is allowed by the New York Times to pose as its adversary.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Whatever democracy the Palestinians had is dying

Almost a desperate cry from a well-known, respected and sober moderate Palestinian.

Mustafa Barghouthi is secretary-general of the Palestinian National Initiative and a member of the Palestinian Legislative Council. He was a candidate for the Palestinian presidency in 2005.

He writes in a piece "The Slow Death of Palestinian Democracy" on FP:

"Palestinian municipal elections were supposed to be held last week. Instead, they were canceled. A statement released by the Palestinian Authority claimed the cancellation was "in order to pave the way for a successful end to the siege on Gaza and for continued efforts at unity" between Hamas, which governs the Gaza Strip, and the government in the West Bank.

The cancellation of this election was an unjustified, unlawful, and unacceptable act. It damages democratic rights and makes a mockery of the interests of the Palestinian people.

But this is far more than an internal Palestinian issue. The only lasting peace between Isr…

Big Brother alive and well in the USA in 2007

The so-called "war on terror" has shown itself up in a multitude of manifestations. The most dangerous thing has been governments using the "excuse" of the war to restrict certain civil liberties, allowing government agencies to pursue a variety of things that they would otherwise would not - and should not - be allowed to do and gathering, and retaining, a variety of information on its citizens.

The Washington Post reports on the latest incursions into civil liberties of all Americans:

"The U.S. government is collecting electronic records on the travel habits of millions of Americans who fly, drive or take cruises abroad, retaining data on the persons with whom they travel or plan to stay, the personal items they carry during their journeys, and even the books that travelers have carried, according to documents obtained by a group of civil liberties advocates and statements by government officials.

The personal travel records are meant to be stored for as lo…