Scandalous....
"These aren't the chemical weapons you're looking for.
New reporting from the New York Times, published online late Tuesday, which reveals that though the administration of George W. Bush employed false claims of a chemical weapons program to justify its 2003 invasion of Saddam Hussein's Iraq (no such program existed), the reality is that substantial, largely forgotten and degraded stockpiles of older weapons did exist inside the country. However, according to the Times, because those weapons dated back to the 1980's—when the U.S. and other nations were acting as an ally to Iraq and, in fact, supplying weapons and chemical agents to Hussein during his war against Iran, U.S. troops who ultimately came across these weapons and ordered to destroy them were told to remain quiet about what they'd encountered, even as it put their own health and those of others in grave danger.
As the newspaper reports, former U.S. soldiers who participated in the disposal of such weapons during the long occupation of Iraq said the Bush administration, including the Pentagon, suppressed the existence of them for several reasons, "including that the government bristled at further acknowledgment it had been wrong."
“They needed something to say that after Sept. 11 Saddam used chemical rounds,” Jarrod Lampier, a recently retired Army major who was present for the largest chemical weapons discovery of the war, told the Times. His unit, he says, found more than 2,400 nerve-agent rockets unearthed in 2006 at a former Republican Guard compound, but said, “all of this was from the pre-1991 era.”
"These aren't the chemical weapons you're looking for.
New reporting from the New York Times, published online late Tuesday, which reveals that though the administration of George W. Bush employed false claims of a chemical weapons program to justify its 2003 invasion of Saddam Hussein's Iraq (no such program existed), the reality is that substantial, largely forgotten and degraded stockpiles of older weapons did exist inside the country. However, according to the Times, because those weapons dated back to the 1980's—when the U.S. and other nations were acting as an ally to Iraq and, in fact, supplying weapons and chemical agents to Hussein during his war against Iran, U.S. troops who ultimately came across these weapons and ordered to destroy them were told to remain quiet about what they'd encountered, even as it put their own health and those of others in grave danger.
As the newspaper reports, former U.S. soldiers who participated in the disposal of such weapons during the long occupation of Iraq said the Bush administration, including the Pentagon, suppressed the existence of them for several reasons, "including that the government bristled at further acknowledgment it had been wrong."
“They needed something to say that after Sept. 11 Saddam used chemical rounds,” Jarrod Lampier, a recently retired Army major who was present for the largest chemical weapons discovery of the war, told the Times. His unit, he says, found more than 2,400 nerve-agent rockets unearthed in 2006 at a former Republican Guard compound, but said, “all of this was from the pre-1991 era.”
Comments