Skip to main content

Egypt kicks its own goal

The so-called trials now underway in Egypt are a sham, a travesty and bear no relationship to a proper judicial process.   The latest judgements relate to, inter alia, a number of Al Jazeera journalists.    The world has been agog - and brought worldwide outrage - that they have been convicted in the first place, let alone the length of the sentences.

As Jess Hill, writing in The Guardian, concludes in her article:

"No Al-Jazeera report could have damaged Egypt’s reputation as much as this sentence. As my Australian-Egyptian colleague Amro Ali observed, there is no bigger threat to the Egyptian state than the Egyptian state."

Hill commences her piece:

"The verdict handed down Monday in the Al-Jazeera trial came as a shock. In a country whose citizens are systematically fed conspiracy theories, three journalists have been jailed for reporting the truth.

We all have so many questions. Was this the decision of one judge, or an order from the top? Egypt's judiciary can be both vindictive and stubborn, but would president Abdel Fattah al-Sisi really leave this ruling to the whim of a public servant? Whether the decision came from the judge alone or not, will Sisi be merciful and bestow a pardon on Peter Greste, Mohamed Fahmy and Baher Mohamed?

If he does, will it be because of international pressure? As former Human Rights Watch activist Heba Morayef observed, we would not have seen a verdict like this under former president Hosni Mubarak, who was acutely sensitive about his international reputation. Does Sisi care what the west thinks of him? It’s not like this ruling is catering to a domestic audience – the Al-Jazeera trial has barely been covered in Egypt.

Could it really be that these journalists, employed by a network owned by the rulers of Qatar, are just being used as fodder for Egypt’s cold war with the gulf state? Or is it just that the Egyptian court system is paranoid?

A search for logical explanations for the Greste verdict may be fruitless. It’s not just journalism that’s under attack in Egypt: anywhere between 16,000 and 41,000 Egyptians have become political prisoners since former president Mohamed Morsi was overthrown last summer. Many now swelter in tiny concrete cells for months on end without charge, their detention renewed by a judge every 45 days."



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reading the Chilcot Inquiry Report more closely

Most commentary on the Chilcot Inquiry Report of and associated with the Iraq War, has been "lifted" from the Executive Summary.   The Intercept has actually gone and dug into the Report, with these revelations : "THE CHILCOT REPORT, the U.K.’s official inquiry into its participation in the Iraq War, has finally been released after seven years of investigation. Its executive summary certainly makes former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who led the British push for war, look terrible. According to the report, Blair made statements about Iraq’s nonexistent chemical, biological, and nuclear programs based on “what Mr. Blair believed” rather than the intelligence he had been given. The U.K. went to war despite the fact that “diplomatic options had not been exhausted.” Blair was warned by British intelligence that terrorism would “increase in the event of war, reflecting intensified anti-US/anti-Western sentiment in the Muslim world, including among Muslim communities in the

An unpalatable truth!

Quinoa has for the last years been the "new" food on the block for foodies. Known for its health properties, foodies the world over have taken to it. Many restaurants have added it to their menu. But, as this piece " Can vegans stomach the unpalatable truth about quinoa? " from The Guardian so clearly details, the cost to Bolivians and Peruvians - from where quinoa hails - has been substantial. "Not long ago, quinoa was just an obscure Peruvian grain you could only buy in wholefood shops. We struggled to pronounce it (it's keen-wa, not qui-no-a), yet it was feted by food lovers as a novel addition to the familiar ranks of couscous and rice. Dieticians clucked over quinoa approvingly because it ticked the low-fat box and fitted in with government healthy eating advice to "base your meals on starchy foods". Adventurous eaters liked its slightly bitter taste and the little white curls that formed around the grains. Vegans embraced quinoa as

Climate change: Well-organised hoax?

There are still some - all too sadly people with a voice who are listened to - who assert that climate change is a hoax. Try telling that to the people of Colorado who recently experienced horrendous bushfires, or the people of Croatia suffering with endless days of temps of 40 degrees (and not much less than 30 at night time) some 8-10 degrees above the norm. Bill McKibben, take up the issue of whether climate change is a hoax, on The Daily Beast : Please don’t sweat the 2,132 new high temperature marks in June—remember, climate change is a hoax. The first to figure this out was Oklahoma Senator James Inhofe, who in fact called it “the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people,” apparently topping even the staged moon landing. But others have been catching on. Speaker of the House John Boehner pointed out that the idea that carbon dioxide is “harmful to the environment is almost comical.” The always cautious Mitt Romney scoffed at any damage too: “Scientists will fig