Skip to main content

The latest outrage in Pakistan

Benjamin Gilmour, author and film-maker, has travelled extensively (and lived) in Pakistan, and indeed, the entire region.    He writes - this, below, from his blog, but the piece was an op-ed piece in The Australian newspaper - about the implications of the murder of health workers in Pakistan the other day.  

"The  brutal murder this week of five Karachi health workers involved in a UN-backed polio eradication drive says more about the wider effect of misguided US policy in the area than it does anything new about the Pakistani Taliban.

Polio has become endemic in Pakistan and, according to the Lancet Medical Journal, accounts for 60% of polio cases worldwide. It is a serious and urgent threat. The director-general of the World Health Organization, Dr. Margaret Chan stated recently that a failure to eradicate polio could lead within a decade to as many as 200,000 paralyzed children a year worldwide.

In a video address on the Gates Foundation website last month, Bill Gates himself pleads with the Pakistani government to keep the fight against polio a matter of national priority.

Immunisation coverage in low and middle income countries has always been directly affected by political situations in those countries. Poorly functioning democracies, as seen in Pakistan, have skewed priorities and tend to spend less public money on information, education and communication. While this is usually due to the greed and corruption of decision makers, some areas of the country, such as the remote Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) inhabited by tribal Pashtuns, have historically been considered too dangerous for government workers and NGOs. This makes immunisation coverage particularly difficult. But until this year the risks to health workers have been largely imagined ones, with only a single reported death of a medic over the past decade in FATA despite steeply rising extremism and militancy.

So why has the Taliban suddenly targeted the polio program?

Since 2001, tens-of-thousands of Pakistanis that have died as a direct or indirect result of the US-led ‘War on Terror’. Pakistani military forces, as well as American unarmed predator drones, have been hitting FATA targets for the past six years, leading to a lack of trust in the Pakistani government and a deep resentment of outsiders arising from enormous anti-American sentiment. The use of lethal drone strikes in particular has had a severe impact on how local Pashtun populations view every other endeavour led by their government or foreign aid groups, even those intended to save lives, such as the polio program. Unsurprisingly, most polio cases reported so far this year were from militancy-hit areas of Pakistan, with only 13 of 44 cases from the settled areas, which have a much larger population.  A report this year by the New America Foundation claims that drone strikes may have killed more than two-thousand civilians in the north-west frontier provinces since 2004. This extrajudicial killing from the sky has, understandably, created widespread hostility to all government workers, including those in the health sector, particularly foreigners.

While the CIA drone campaign first provoked many in FATA to boycott polio vaccination, the most significant escalation of this followed the fake immunisation program created to facilitate the assassination of Osama bin Laden. To do this, the CIA enlisted the help of a real doctor, Shakil Afridi who, on the pretext of a routine vaccination campaign, sought access to the Abbottabad compound in which they believed Osama bin Laden was hiding. The doctor’s mission was to retain the needles of the fake hepatitis-B vaccination campaign for DNA testing by the CIA to determine if the children in the compound might be related to Osama bin Laden, confirming the possibility he resided in the compound. In the process, Dr. Afridi not only caused the Pakistani government considerable loss of face, but his actions in collaboration with the CIA, undermined his medical colleagues in Pakistan who have helped bring the country very close to polio eradication several years ago. Dr. Afridi acted well outside of the Hippocratic oath which doctors swear to uphold when they graduate. The oath clearly states that treatment or diagnostic tests applied to any patient should be ‘carried out only for the good of patients and not for any intentional ill-doing, abstaining from whatever is deleterious and mischievous’ (Hippocrates, 400 BCE). A real medical doctor engaging in a fake vaccination program subverts not only the trust placed in all medical practitioners, but in this case the trust Pakistani people place in those honestly committed to eradicating disease.

Complete worldwide eradication of the polio virus could well be this decade’s disease control success story were it not for Pakistan. Local militants responsible for killing the vaccine workers this week must be brought to justice. But can we really expect Pakistanis to trust our desire to help them save lives when our allies, the US, are simultaneously bombing the country and creating fake immunisation programs in order to catch their most wanted? Let us hope that ongoing negotiation between the UN, WHO and the Pakistani Government, as well as discussions between the Gates Foundation and the Taliban via Saudi intermediaries, can help to get the Pakistani polio program back on track."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reading the Chilcot Inquiry Report more closely

Most commentary on the Chilcot Inquiry Report of and associated with the Iraq War, has been "lifted" from the Executive Summary.   The Intercept has actually gone and dug into the Report, with these revelations : "THE CHILCOT REPORT, the U.K.’s official inquiry into its participation in the Iraq War, has finally been released after seven years of investigation. Its executive summary certainly makes former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who led the British push for war, look terrible. According to the report, Blair made statements about Iraq’s nonexistent chemical, biological, and nuclear programs based on “what Mr. Blair believed” rather than the intelligence he had been given. The U.K. went to war despite the fact that “diplomatic options had not been exhausted.” Blair was warned by British intelligence that terrorism would “increase in the event of war, reflecting intensified anti-US/anti-Western sentiment in the Muslim world, including among Muslim communities in the

Robert Fisk's predictions for the Middle East in 2013

There is no gain-saying that Robert Fisk, fiercely independent and feisty to boot, is the veteran journalist and author covering the Middle East. Who doesn't he know or hasn't he met over the years in reporting from Beirut - where he lives?  In his latest op-ed piece for The Independent he lays out his predictions for the Middle East for 2013. Read the piece in full, here - well worthwhile - but an extract... "Never make predictions in the Middle East. My crystal ball broke long ago. But predicting the region has an honourable pedigree. “An Arab movement, newly-risen, is looming in the distance,” a French traveller to the Gulf and Baghdad wrote in 1883, “and a race hitherto downtrodden will presently claim its due place in the destinies of Islam.” A year earlier, a British diplomat in Jeddah confided that “it is within my knowledge... that the idea of freedom does at present agitate some minds even in Mecca...” So let’s say this for 2013: the “Arab Awakening” (the t

An unpalatable truth!

Quinoa has for the last years been the "new" food on the block for foodies. Known for its health properties, foodies the world over have taken to it. Many restaurants have added it to their menu. But, as this piece " Can vegans stomach the unpalatable truth about quinoa? " from The Guardian so clearly details, the cost to Bolivians and Peruvians - from where quinoa hails - has been substantial. "Not long ago, quinoa was just an obscure Peruvian grain you could only buy in wholefood shops. We struggled to pronounce it (it's keen-wa, not qui-no-a), yet it was feted by food lovers as a novel addition to the familiar ranks of couscous and rice. Dieticians clucked over quinoa approvingly because it ticked the low-fat box and fitted in with government healthy eating advice to "base your meals on starchy foods". Adventurous eaters liked its slightly bitter taste and the little white curls that formed around the grains. Vegans embraced quinoa as