Skip to main content

Bewigged [or not!] - and being bemused

To those not accustomed to seeing judges and barristers sporting a wig and old-fashioned collars and bands, it is seen as an anachronism in the 21st century. It is! So, the decision to do away with wigs, collars and bands in civil cases in the UK should have been seen as a small step in the right direction in bring the legal system into the modern age.

But wait! The English Bar has rebelled and wants to retain the old-world regalia - as this somewhat bemusing piece in The Independent explains:

"The arch-reformers of the Bar must be pulling out their hair in despair. No sooner have the judges taken the bold step of agreeing to remove their wigs in court than barristers have voted to keep theirs on.

A survey of 15,000 advocates published this week has left the leaders of the Bar in no doubt as to what its membership thinks of wigless lawyers. Two-thirds of barristers and "interested parties" polled said that they wished to retain full legal costume in High Court cases and above.

This now raises the rather unedifying spectacle of a courtroom presided over by a bare-headed judge hearing arguments advanced by barristers looking even more like players in the royal courts of Hanoverian England.

In July, Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, the Lord Chief Justice, announced that from next year, judges in civil cases will no longer wear wigs, collars and bands. Instead they will sport a continental-style gown. For criminal cases the wig is to be retained."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reading the Chilcot Inquiry Report more closely

Most commentary on the Chilcot Inquiry Report of and associated with the Iraq War, has been "lifted" from the Executive Summary.   The Intercept has actually gone and dug into the Report, with these revelations : "THE CHILCOT REPORT, the U.K.’s official inquiry into its participation in the Iraq War, has finally been released after seven years of investigation. Its executive summary certainly makes former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who led the British push for war, look terrible. According to the report, Blair made statements about Iraq’s nonexistent chemical, biological, and nuclear programs based on “what Mr. Blair believed” rather than the intelligence he had been given. The U.K. went to war despite the fact that “diplomatic options had not been exhausted.” Blair was warned by British intelligence that terrorism would “increase in the event of war, reflecting intensified anti-US/anti-Western sentiment in the Muslim world, including among Muslim communities in the

An unpalatable truth!

Quinoa has for the last years been the "new" food on the block for foodies. Known for its health properties, foodies the world over have taken to it. Many restaurants have added it to their menu. But, as this piece " Can vegans stomach the unpalatable truth about quinoa? " from The Guardian so clearly details, the cost to Bolivians and Peruvians - from where quinoa hails - has been substantial. "Not long ago, quinoa was just an obscure Peruvian grain you could only buy in wholefood shops. We struggled to pronounce it (it's keen-wa, not qui-no-a), yet it was feted by food lovers as a novel addition to the familiar ranks of couscous and rice. Dieticians clucked over quinoa approvingly because it ticked the low-fat box and fitted in with government healthy eating advice to "base your meals on starchy foods". Adventurous eaters liked its slightly bitter taste and the little white curls that formed around the grains. Vegans embraced quinoa as

Climate change: Well-organised hoax?

There are still some - all too sadly people with a voice who are listened to - who assert that climate change is a hoax. Try telling that to the people of Colorado who recently experienced horrendous bushfires, or the people of Croatia suffering with endless days of temps of 40 degrees (and not much less than 30 at night time) some 8-10 degrees above the norm. Bill McKibben, take up the issue of whether climate change is a hoax, on The Daily Beast : Please don’t sweat the 2,132 new high temperature marks in June—remember, climate change is a hoax. The first to figure this out was Oklahoma Senator James Inhofe, who in fact called it “the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people,” apparently topping even the staged moon landing. But others have been catching on. Speaker of the House John Boehner pointed out that the idea that carbon dioxide is “harmful to the environment is almost comical.” The always cautious Mitt Romney scoffed at any damage too: “Scientists will fig