Skip to main content

Muslims, Pauline Hanson and John Howard's racism

"Let's say immediately what it seems Prime Minister John Howard cannot say: to the extent that they follow their religion, Australian Muslims are good citizens. They don't gamble or drink or steal, they are family-minded, community-minded — particularly within their own ethnic/religious community — and they are civic-minded too."

So writes Barney Zwartz, Religion Editor, in The Age yesterday, here, in a nuanced and balanced op-ed piece on Muslims in the Australian community. And he goes on to say:

"The one thing Muslims want is the same automatic acceptance Australians of other religions and races have gained. Catholics, Jews, Greeks, Italians and Vietnamese, among others, were once in their shoes. Albanians, Turks, and Indonesians today are pretty thoroughly integrated, though still thoroughly Muslim. They see no conflict between Islam and democracy or "Australian values".

The racism-card Howard & Co are running - shades of Tampa II? - is a disgrace and an effront to decent people. But then again Howard has a track-record of being a racist and bigot.

As Emma Dawson - a fellow at the OzProspect think tank and a PhD candidate at the National Centre for Australian Studies, Monash University - points out in an op-ed piece in The Age today under the headline "What the PM owes to Hansonism" it is 10 years ago on 10 September that Pauline Hanson jumped onto the national agenda after making her maiden speech in the Federal Parliament.

As Dawson writes:

"...... because Hanson and her subsequent political outfit, One Nation, proved to be the Trojan Horse by which Howard and his fellow reactionaries, the driest of the Liberal dries, smuggled their decades-old prejudices and grievances into the national consciousness."

Read the complete Dawson piece here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reading the Chilcot Inquiry Report more closely

Most commentary on the Chilcot Inquiry Report of and associated with the Iraq War, has been "lifted" from the Executive Summary.   The Intercept has actually gone and dug into the Report, with these revelations : "THE CHILCOT REPORT, the U.K.’s official inquiry into its participation in the Iraq War, has finally been released after seven years of investigation. Its executive summary certainly makes former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who led the British push for war, look terrible. According to the report, Blair made statements about Iraq’s nonexistent chemical, biological, and nuclear programs based on “what Mr. Blair believed” rather than the intelligence he had been given. The U.K. went to war despite the fact that “diplomatic options had not been exhausted.” Blair was warned by British intelligence that terrorism would “increase in the event of war, reflecting intensified anti-US/anti-Western sentiment in the Muslim world, including among Muslim communities in the

Robert Fisk's predictions for the Middle East in 2013

There is no gain-saying that Robert Fisk, fiercely independent and feisty to boot, is the veteran journalist and author covering the Middle East. Who doesn't he know or hasn't he met over the years in reporting from Beirut - where he lives?  In his latest op-ed piece for The Independent he lays out his predictions for the Middle East for 2013. Read the piece in full, here - well worthwhile - but an extract... "Never make predictions in the Middle East. My crystal ball broke long ago. But predicting the region has an honourable pedigree. “An Arab movement, newly-risen, is looming in the distance,” a French traveller to the Gulf and Baghdad wrote in 1883, “and a race hitherto downtrodden will presently claim its due place in the destinies of Islam.” A year earlier, a British diplomat in Jeddah confided that “it is within my knowledge... that the idea of freedom does at present agitate some minds even in Mecca...” So let’s say this for 2013: the “Arab Awakening” (the t

An unpalatable truth!

Quinoa has for the last years been the "new" food on the block for foodies. Known for its health properties, foodies the world over have taken to it. Many restaurants have added it to their menu. But, as this piece " Can vegans stomach the unpalatable truth about quinoa? " from The Guardian so clearly details, the cost to Bolivians and Peruvians - from where quinoa hails - has been substantial. "Not long ago, quinoa was just an obscure Peruvian grain you could only buy in wholefood shops. We struggled to pronounce it (it's keen-wa, not qui-no-a), yet it was feted by food lovers as a novel addition to the familiar ranks of couscous and rice. Dieticians clucked over quinoa approvingly because it ticked the low-fat box and fitted in with government healthy eating advice to "base your meals on starchy foods". Adventurous eaters liked its slightly bitter taste and the little white curls that formed around the grains. Vegans embraced quinoa as