Skip to main content

Warfare: Today's health emergency

As the world watches the unfolding tragedy of what is Ebola, this piece "Modern War: A True Modern Medical Emergency" on CommonDreams details how modern warfare is creating a totally different medical emergency.   It is something all of us, wherever we live, will have to deal with.

"For some years now, prominent doctors, medical organizations and institutions such as Partners in Health (PIH) have been talking about the  critical importance of "life on the ground" factors that influence health. And even more importantly, they have been initiating and implementing projects based on a holistic, human rights approach and encouraging others to do the same.  PIH has been promoting support for international covenants that guarantee health as a human right,  understanding that the health of individuals and communities is directly impacted by other guaranteed rights: adequate housing, education, food, social security, decent work, and "the right to the highest standard of physical and mental health."

A February 2014 paper published in The Lancet goes even further. The report—The Lancet-University of Oslo Commission on Global Governance for Health: The political origins of health inequity: prospects for change—points out that in today's globalized world, ensuring health requires  looking beyond communities or country borders to "... policy areas that affect health and that require improved global governance: economic crises and austerity measures, knowledge and intellectual property, foreign investment, treaties, food security, transnational corporate activity, irregular migration and violent conflict."

It's radical and powerful stuff: controlling transnational corporate activity or abandoning a war because it threatens health?  This is stuff you don't hear or read in the mainstream media, and stuff you may not think about if you're not in the medical profession, reading journals such as The Lancet.  But, on some level it's common sense, something everyone,  everywhere knows; your health is the sum total of every aspect of you and the world you inhabit.  Your "health" was being determined before you were born, by your parent's circumstances and by those of their parents.  It's basic and obvious, hidden in plain sight.

In the background of the Ebola crisis, quietly day by day, out of the headlines and seemingly unimportant, the US and others are bombing in Iraq and Syria; no one is talking about how this will impact health or the health care system in those countries. In the case of Iraq, the question is how it will further exacerbate the already disastrous and ever-deteriorating health situation that has been developing over the last twenty four years, since the First Gulf War and UN Sanctions in 1990.

The country once had the best medical care in the Middle East.  It was a modern country, with modern facilities and infrastructure.  Social and economic policies supported  other aspects of life that contributed to a healthy population: free and mandatory education through university, affordable housing, ample food availability and high employment, guaranteed by government subsidized jobs. Most, if not all of this is long gone, along with the general state of  good health and well-being of the population in Iraq.  It shouldn't surprise anyone.  As the famous poster said, back in the 60s, War is not Healthy for Children and Other Living Things.  Another obvious truth gathering dust in closets all over the USA."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Pentagon's eye-popping spending....and waste!

Only a gigantic bureaucracy could get away with spending of such dimensions - and the amazing waste involved in part of that ginormous spend.   Think US Pentagon..... "From spending $150 million on private villas for a handful of personnel in Afghanistan to blowing $2.7 billion on an air surveillance balloon that doesn’t work, the latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.  Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars' worth of weapons components that will never be used. And then there’s the one that would have to be everyone’s favorite Pentagon waste story: the spending of $50,000 to investigate the bomb-detecting capabilities of African elephants. (And here’s a shock: they didn’t turn out to be that great!) The elephant research, of course, represe...

Video: Israel demolishing a Bedouin village

From Mondoweiss - Israel's supposed "most moral army in the world", the IDF, engaged in immoral, and according to international law, illegal action.... "Israeli forces have demolished every home in the Bedouin village of Khirbet Taha in the northern West Bank district of Nablus during three separate demolitions since the start of the year. Unlike most Bedouin villages, the residents in Khirbet Taha own their own land. However that land falls in Area C, territory in the occupied West Bank under full Israeli control. The village’s only school was also destroyed, leaving children to study in a dilapidated 100-year-old mosque — the only structure left standing in the village. According the United Nations, Israel has demolished half as many Palestinian buildings in the first few months of 2016, as they had in all of 2015. In February alone, the UN found that more Palestinians homes were destroyed than any other month since 2009, when the organization began its docum...

What does a no-fly zone actually mean?

As some countries consider imposing a no-fly zone in relation to Libya, the pertinent question must be what does that mean and entail? FP provides the answers: "It depends on the circumstances. There are two primary types of no-fly zones imposed by air forces. The first is imposed by one military over another, while the two sides are at war. In practice, this type of no-fly zone amounts to a warning from one side that it will engage the other's aircraft if they are spotted in a given territory. The second type, more applicable to the situation in Libya, is when an outside power possessing overwhelming air superiority restricts flights over a given country in order to discourage an internal conflict or humanitarian crisis. This is a relatively recent tactic, which was used most famously in Bosnia and Iraq during the 1990s. No-fly zones are often a compromise in situations where the international community is demanding a response to ongoing violence, but full military interven...