Skip to main content

Australia takes a giant step backwards

If proof was ever needed that Governments are stupid - and those that lead it even more so - than stand up Australia as #1 candidate for being not only dumb, but dumber!   The village idiots have won out - supported by the likes of the way-past it man, Rupert Murdoch.   He who derided "windmills" and things like that associated with climate change as "rubbish".

"Australia on Thursday scrapped its carbon tax, a move denounced by critics as a monumental step backwards on climate action that amounts to "inter-generational theft."

After lengthy debate, the Senate voted Thursday 39-32 to repeal it following its passage in the House of Representatives earlier this week.

The charge of roughly 25 Australian dollars per ton of carbon dioxide was put into effect under the previous administration of Prime Minister Julia Gillard. A report this month from the Australian National University found that the tax worked, helping to reduce between 11 and 17 million tons of CO2 cumulatively.

While Abbott cheered the vote scrapping the tax as "great news," and said it fulfills a campaign promise, critics of his climate policy decried the decision as a path towards further climate catastrophe at the community's expense.

EU Climate Action Commissioner Connie Hedegaard expressed "regret" for repeal of the tax which was working. "The EU is convinced that pricing carbon is not only the most cost-effective way to reduce emissions, but also THE tool to make the economic paradigm shift the world needs," she stated Thursday.

Addressing the Senate on Tuesday, Australian Greens leader Christine Milne said the move was a "pyrrhic victory because it is the community who will be paying with their lives, their farms, their futures, so that the big polluters can get off scot-free in Australia."

Milne also stressed that it represented a failure to act on climate, which would ultimately "impos[e] on our children a harder life."

"The Prime Minister and every single member who votes for the abolition of the energy bills are engaging in intergenerational theft," Milne said.

The Australia-based Climate Institute denounced the repeal, which makes the nation the first to axe a functioning carbon market, as "a monumentally reckless backward leap" away from climate action.

Like Milne, John Connor, CEO of the organization, criticized how the repeal of the tax shifts "responsibility of emission reductions shift from major polluters to the taxpayer."

"The result of repeal today is that Australia is bereft of credible climate policy just as the international community focuses on deeper reduction targets for 2025 and 2030, and even the heads of organizations like the International Monetary Fund, OECD and World Bank talk of the need to completely decarbonize the global economy by the second half of this century," Connor stated."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Pentagon's eye-popping spending....and waste!

Only a gigantic bureaucracy could get away with spending of such dimensions - and the amazing waste involved in part of that ginormous spend.   Think US Pentagon..... "From spending $150 million on private villas for a handful of personnel in Afghanistan to blowing $2.7 billion on an air surveillance balloon that doesn’t work, the latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.  Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars' worth of weapons components that will never be used. And then there’s the one that would have to be everyone’s favorite Pentagon waste story: the spending of $50,000 to investigate the bomb-detecting capabilities of African elephants. (And here’s a shock: they didn’t turn out to be that great!) The elephant research, of course, represe...

Video: Israel demolishing a Bedouin village

From Mondoweiss - Israel's supposed "most moral army in the world", the IDF, engaged in immoral, and according to international law, illegal action.... "Israeli forces have demolished every home in the Bedouin village of Khirbet Taha in the northern West Bank district of Nablus during three separate demolitions since the start of the year. Unlike most Bedouin villages, the residents in Khirbet Taha own their own land. However that land falls in Area C, territory in the occupied West Bank under full Israeli control. The village’s only school was also destroyed, leaving children to study in a dilapidated 100-year-old mosque — the only structure left standing in the village. According the United Nations, Israel has demolished half as many Palestinian buildings in the first few months of 2016, as they had in all of 2015. In February alone, the UN found that more Palestinians homes were destroyed than any other month since 2009, when the organization began its docum...

What does a no-fly zone actually mean?

As some countries consider imposing a no-fly zone in relation to Libya, the pertinent question must be what does that mean and entail? FP provides the answers: "It depends on the circumstances. There are two primary types of no-fly zones imposed by air forces. The first is imposed by one military over another, while the two sides are at war. In practice, this type of no-fly zone amounts to a warning from one side that it will engage the other's aircraft if they are spotted in a given territory. The second type, more applicable to the situation in Libya, is when an outside power possessing overwhelming air superiority restricts flights over a given country in order to discourage an internal conflict or humanitarian crisis. This is a relatively recent tactic, which was used most famously in Bosnia and Iraq during the 1990s. No-fly zones are often a compromise in situations where the international community is demanding a response to ongoing violence, but full military interven...