Skip to main content

Forget talk! Time for positive action

A more than timely, and appropriate, editorial - and a call for action! - in The Independent, following Israel's brazen decision to erect some 3000 homes in the occupied territories for settlers in total breach of international law and the so-called peace process.    By the way, the latter can be now said to be well and truly dead  - as also the so-called Two State Solution.

"Israel has not only "punished" the Palestinians for seeking and achieving an upgrade of UN status, it has also slapped the face of the UK and of Germany, both of whom withheld support for the Palestinians in the vote.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's decision to give the go-ahead for some 3,000 new homes in the occupied territories may be part of long-held plans to cut off East Jerusalem from the rest of the Palestinian territories, killing off hopes of a separate state with a capital in Jerusalem. Alternatively, it may be another move in Israel's old game of suggesting the worst and then demanding favours for restraint. In either case, it cannot go unchallenged.

Thus far, Britain, France and Sweden have indicated their anger by calling in the Israeli ambassadors. Germany, unusually supportive, has publicly condemned Israel's action. But although this may be strong stuff in diplomatic circles, in practical terms it means very little unless it is accompanied by actions.

Mr Netanyahu has thrown down the gauntlet, declaring on Sunday that "we will carry on building in Jerusalem and in all the places that are on the map of Israel's strategic interests". If that is really his policy, then he is knowingly and deliberately crushing any hope of a negotiated two-state solution to the world's longest-running and most destructive dispute.

The Foreign Office says that it is considering further action if Israel does not withdraw its measures. Recalling our ambassador from Israel, as early rumours suggested might be the case, is self-defeating. This is a case where Europe should and could act as a whole. For starters, we could ban the import of any products from the settlements and insist on labelling of origin as a precondition of any import. We could also decide to rescind the "association agreement" recently signed with Israel giving it considerable trading advantages.

For too long Europe has looked to the US to do the arm-twisting on Israel. It is time that we showed some grit of our own. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Pentagon's eye-popping spending....and waste!

Only a gigantic bureaucracy could get away with spending of such dimensions - and the amazing waste involved in part of that ginormous spend.   Think US Pentagon..... "From spending $150 million on private villas for a handful of personnel in Afghanistan to blowing $2.7 billion on an air surveillance balloon that doesn’t work, the latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.  Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars' worth of weapons components that will never be used. And then there’s the one that would have to be everyone’s favorite Pentagon waste story: the spending of $50,000 to investigate the bomb-detecting capabilities of African elephants. (And here’s a shock: they didn’t turn out to be that great!) The elephant research, of course, represe...

Video: Israel demolishing a Bedouin village

From Mondoweiss - Israel's supposed "most moral army in the world", the IDF, engaged in immoral, and according to international law, illegal action.... "Israeli forces have demolished every home in the Bedouin village of Khirbet Taha in the northern West Bank district of Nablus during three separate demolitions since the start of the year. Unlike most Bedouin villages, the residents in Khirbet Taha own their own land. However that land falls in Area C, territory in the occupied West Bank under full Israeli control. The village’s only school was also destroyed, leaving children to study in a dilapidated 100-year-old mosque — the only structure left standing in the village. According the United Nations, Israel has demolished half as many Palestinian buildings in the first few months of 2016, as they had in all of 2015. In February alone, the UN found that more Palestinians homes were destroyed than any other month since 2009, when the organization began its docum...

What does a no-fly zone actually mean?

As some countries consider imposing a no-fly zone in relation to Libya, the pertinent question must be what does that mean and entail? FP provides the answers: "It depends on the circumstances. There are two primary types of no-fly zones imposed by air forces. The first is imposed by one military over another, while the two sides are at war. In practice, this type of no-fly zone amounts to a warning from one side that it will engage the other's aircraft if they are spotted in a given territory. The second type, more applicable to the situation in Libya, is when an outside power possessing overwhelming air superiority restricts flights over a given country in order to discourage an internal conflict or humanitarian crisis. This is a relatively recent tactic, which was used most famously in Bosnia and Iraq during the 1990s. No-fly zones are often a compromise in situations where the international community is demanding a response to ongoing violence, but full military interven...