Skip to main content

Meanwhile back in Congo.....

The world is quick to "ignore" Africa even if there are famines, floods, wars and massacres going on in one of the countries making up the large continent.   Then again, one rarely reads or sees any reports from Africa, good, bad or indifferent. 

Things are grim in the Congo, as this report "In Congo, UN troops prove useless again" on star.com from Congo so painfully reveals.

"The uselessness of UN peacekeeping troops is yet again being witnessed by the world — or at least that tiny fraction of the planet that cares what happens in the endlessly exploited and chronically invaded Congo.

Africa’s World War, as it is known — an estimated 5 million dead, most succumbing to the cascading effects of conflict, displacement, malnutrition, disease and poverty — formally came to an end in 2003, with armies from half a dozen meddlesome neighbouring countries withdrawing their forces.

Paramilitaries, however, stayed put, retreating into the thick jungles that surround major cities in eastern regions of the nation. Most notable of those rebel factions were the National Congress for the Defence of the People (CNDP), purportedly defunct and integrated into the Congolese army, and the Forces Démocratique de Liberation du Rwanda (FDLR), a Hutu guerrilla group based in the eastern DRC that originally crossed the border in pursuit of Tutsis.

Extremist Hutus were responsible for the 1994 genocide in Rwanda, upwards of 800,000 ethnic rival Tutsis and moderate Hutus slain in a killing frenzy that the West (and the UN) had been warned was coming — indeed, the plotted mass carnage had been advertised and promoted on radio broadcasts — yet did nothing to avert. Canadian Senator Romeo Dallaire, force commander of the UN mission in Rwanda at the time, knows this only too well. His increasingly desperate warnings were ignored. An untold number of bodies were simply dumped in Lake Kivu, to hide the evidence. Former U.S. president Bill Clinton has called the failure to respond the deepest regret of his terms in office."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Pentagon's eye-popping spending....and waste!

Only a gigantic bureaucracy could get away with spending of such dimensions - and the amazing waste involved in part of that ginormous spend.   Think US Pentagon..... "From spending $150 million on private villas for a handful of personnel in Afghanistan to blowing $2.7 billion on an air surveillance balloon that doesn’t work, the latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.  Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars' worth of weapons components that will never be used. And then there’s the one that would have to be everyone’s favorite Pentagon waste story: the spending of $50,000 to investigate the bomb-detecting capabilities of African elephants. (And here’s a shock: they didn’t turn out to be that great!) The elephant research, of course, represe...

Video: Israel demolishing a Bedouin village

From Mondoweiss - Israel's supposed "most moral army in the world", the IDF, engaged in immoral, and according to international law, illegal action.... "Israeli forces have demolished every home in the Bedouin village of Khirbet Taha in the northern West Bank district of Nablus during three separate demolitions since the start of the year. Unlike most Bedouin villages, the residents in Khirbet Taha own their own land. However that land falls in Area C, territory in the occupied West Bank under full Israeli control. The village’s only school was also destroyed, leaving children to study in a dilapidated 100-year-old mosque — the only structure left standing in the village. According the United Nations, Israel has demolished half as many Palestinian buildings in the first few months of 2016, as they had in all of 2015. In February alone, the UN found that more Palestinians homes were destroyed than any other month since 2009, when the organization began its docum...

What does a no-fly zone actually mean?

As some countries consider imposing a no-fly zone in relation to Libya, the pertinent question must be what does that mean and entail? FP provides the answers: "It depends on the circumstances. There are two primary types of no-fly zones imposed by air forces. The first is imposed by one military over another, while the two sides are at war. In practice, this type of no-fly zone amounts to a warning from one side that it will engage the other's aircraft if they are spotted in a given territory. The second type, more applicable to the situation in Libya, is when an outside power possessing overwhelming air superiority restricts flights over a given country in order to discourage an internal conflict or humanitarian crisis. This is a relatively recent tactic, which was used most famously in Bosnia and Iraq during the 1990s. No-fly zones are often a compromise in situations where the international community is demanding a response to ongoing violence, but full military interven...